Greenberg Traurig reviews

3.8

62% would recommend to a friend

(535 total reviews)
avatar

Brian Duffy

66% approve of CEO

63% positive business outlook

Greenberg Traurig has an employee rating of 3.8 out of 5 stars, based on 535 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Greenberg Traurig employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Legal industry (3.8 stars).

Reviews by job title

535 reviews
2.0
Jan 3, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good health insurance plan and occasional office events/parties

Cons

The immigration team leadership will brag about being one of the few immigration departments in big law that is actually profitable, and will lie about paying above market rates. Other comparable business immigration firms start out at at least $10K more for the same roles. The higher ups will cite inflation and higher cost of living as an excuse to not pay better yet the company still continues to turn a profit. They don’t care about how inflation individually affects their staff. The Employee Assistance Program is also not great and difficult to navigate. You get little to no feedback on your work, a case load that is unmanageable, and hardly no training. If you do your work right no one bats an eye, but one mistake that might have gotten overlooked by everyone working on the case (paralegal, attorney, package reviewer, and client), and you will be thrown under the bus. They will try to claim a hybrid work schedule as a perk, but provide no resources and even across teams it isn’t implemented uniformly and you will end up having to go in anyways. The way the cases are prepared is more about churning them out fast as opposed to putting out a quality work product, but at the same time management will expect you to know immigration law inside out.

1.0
Sep 4, 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

When I initially got the job offer, it was during Covid post grad, I was SO excited to be getting real experience for my resume! My excitement quickly went down hill. I enjoyed being able to wfh two days a week, their healthcare is great but don’t expect HR to explain it to you, and you can make some friends. Please read ahead in cons to get my real opinion.

Cons

Like I said, the excitement wore off quickly. They are permanently understaffed and overworked, so they don’t have time to properly train their employees. During my first month, I received no proper training and was handling non-immigrant petitions more quickly than I was comfortable with. These are peoples lives that you’re putting in the hands of inexperienced individuals, just so you can pay them 40/45k starting. If you want to hire inexperienced people, make sure that the attorneys or someone gives these individuals proper guidance. You’re made to feel dumb if you have any questions about the process so you just do your best. No one is actually double checking your work though. It goes through “3 review processes” but they’re just skimming due to their workload. This leads to countless RFEs that are unnecessary. They’re constantly lying to foreign nationals and companies about the status of petitions. Sometimes even “confirming” it’s been filed for it to be filed weeks, if not months later. Again, these are peoples lives. The stress of being overworked and under guided builds up, which is why turnover is high. Attorneys don’t even show up to the case status review meetings that are supposed to help guide their business staff, which makes it extremely hard to get stuff done. If you say something about it, nothing gets done. There are no consequences because some people are put on a pedestal and they can’t be touched. It doesn’t help that management is so unwilling to hear these issues. It’s HILARIOUS that management is coming on here to belittle current and former employees about their negative reviews. Specifically calling out college grads for “just wanting to enjoy events, do some work, and go home” is really telling when you actively seek out college grads to underpay and overwork them. That’s an incredibly broad stereotype based on a false narrative. It’s very pathetic and sad. How about you do REAL work to make your practice more tolerable as an employee instead of typing out essays of stuff you wouldn’t have the gall to have an actual conversation about? Just look at the positive recent reviews, you’ll be able to tell which ones are written by management. You constantly say that you’re working on things to “make them better” but you never follow through on it. Excuses are made over and over again, but where is the progress? You have the time to read Glassdoor reviews and respond but when was the last time something new was implemented? Don’t think HR is your friend either. Don’t go to them with anything. At the end of the day, this is an entry level law job. If you think you can put up with a negative work environment for at least a year and get out, do it. The experience holds weight. Take the experience and go to a competitor.

3.0
May 14, 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Intelligent, dynamic attorneys Results oriented attorneys who put clients first Business and support staff are terrific Cesar Alvarez - enough said Global and national presence and platform

Cons

Compensation is uneven and inconsistent Overall firm leadership (especially at the top) is seriously lacking and has been over the past 8 years Little to no succession planning Difficult for "service partners" to succeed (survive) over time Increasingly low morale among many attorneys and staff members

Viewing 10 - 12 of 535 Reviews

Glassdoor has 592 Greenberg Traurig reviews submitted anonymously by Greenberg Traurig employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Greenberg Traurig is right for you.