Greenberg Traurig reviews

3.8

62% would recommend to a friend

(536 total reviews)
avatar

Brian Duffy

66% approve of CEO

63% positive business outlook

Greenberg Traurig has an employee rating of 3.8 out of 5 stars, based on 536 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Greenberg Traurig employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Legal industry (3.8 stars).

Reviews by job title

536 reviews
3.0
Jun 12, 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

-Prestigious firm, excellent reputation, global -Generous business development budget for associates -Associates are allowed to collect on originations they bring in (some firms do not allow this) -Both formal and informal mentoring and Bus Dev and Professional Development available for those that want it. -Cross-selling is out of control here, pretty awesome, haven't seen anything like it elsewhere. -Origination credit is shared as opposed to limited to just the original attorney that brought in the client. Those that do the work will also get some credit although it might not be weighted equally. -For Biglaw it's high on diversity rankings (depends on the office), adopted the Mansfield Rule -Each office has autonomy and run like a small firm. GT is run like a business instead of like a law firm - They treat their Of Counsel like partners. Other firms treat Of Counsel like second class citizens but GT treats them with respect/ as valuable. You can still transition to partner from of counsel whereas at other firms, it might be a dead end. -All the employees are treated with respect. Very laid back environment. Other firms have separate parties and events keeping a clear dividing line between staff and attorneys but GT is happily blended not segregated. - This place is like a haven for people that didn't fit into more traditional firms. - Less beaurocratic than other firms.

Cons

- Tradeoff for sweet lifestyle is way below market pay. Only certain offices are at the $180k payscale. - Black box compensation system (although some see this as a plus) - Lack of transparency and clear objectives. The idea is that this allows greater flexibility to reward and promote those that don't hit the traditional markers but are still bringing in value to the firm, but the down side is that it looks like they are trying to hide something (i.e. no clear objectives so they can keep moving the bar). -Lack of diversity in leadership

1.0
Aug 17, 2014

Run .... no, really ... RUN

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

If you look hard enough you'll find some smart and nice lawyers. The staff is generally pretty nice. They are awesome at spinning a story about how great the platform is - and why everyone else who left (with their crazy high turnover) wasn't able to take advantage of the awesome platform (as they spin it). If Jack is your ethics hero, then you'll love it.

Cons

I was a counsel at GT for over 5 years. I believed the sales job they did on how great the platform was and how collegial it was. It didn't take long for the horror of my mistake to kick in. Like others, I ran into a culture of very sharp elbows. Their platform was certainly not any better in terms of getting business than my prior platform - in fact it tended to be more of a negative because the reputation for quality and ethics was terrible. There are three levels of shareholder; the lowest level SH and counsel are a far cry from the highest.. The low level SH and counsel end up being paid about 15-20% of their collections. It would not be unusual to collect over $1M on origination and be paid less than an associate. All attorneys are also tagged with an incredibly high overhead (close to $300k per year) while not actually getting any resources for that money. Some of the staff indicate that the attorneys have it good and they don't; well I would say it is probably top shareholders that have it well, lower tier shareholders, counsel and associates do not.

2.0
Oct 18, 2018

Business Immigration Case Coordinator

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I started working at GT fresh out of university in an entry level role. It seems like the immigration group is constantly growing in sporadic bursts as it acquires new clients and I was one of the new hires to help onboard this client. GT offers virtually unlimited opportunity for overtime and the high-stress environment facilitates a close bond between coworkers.

Cons

GT hired me for what was essentially a temporary assignment without my knowledge. They had acquired a massive new client and needed all the help they could get with the transition. I had no experience in immigration or paralegal duties coming in, but I was assured that I would be provided training. This proved not to be true at all. When problems arise the only people you can turn to are your coworkers, who are already overworked. The office managers made no effort to be available for questions, and when you finally do catch one for a question, they are extremely rude and annoyed. When things were finally stable with the new client I was let go with absolutely no forewarning and replaced by someone with several years of experience. The reason cited for my dismissal was errors in my work product, but I was never once approached or warned about this. The management does not care for their employees and views them as expendable. The paralegal profession is essentially dead-end because law school is required for any real promotion.

Viewing 4 - 6 of 536 Reviews

Glassdoor has 593 Greenberg Traurig reviews submitted anonymously by Greenberg Traurig employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Greenberg Traurig is right for you.