Tutor.com reviews

3.3

46% would recommend to a friend

(595 total reviews)

Hyoung Jun (Joshua) Park

36% approve of CEO

33% positive business outlook

Tutor.com has an employee rating of 3.3 out of 5 stars, based on 595 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Tutor.com employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Educación industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

595 reviews
2.0
Jan 22, 2012
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

1. Flexibility: Being able to set my own hours is great. 2. Working for home: Convenient, able to multitask while working, and tax deductions come with the territory. 3. Being of help: It's great to know that I'm able to help students. 4. A great opportunity to learn new skills, keep up with new information/techniques currently being taught in the classrooms, and maintain skills.

Cons

1. Salary: Tutors are not compensated well as compared to other tutors. Tutors are also not compensated well when the company's profit is taken into consideration. Money was taken away from the tutors, and though Tutor.com continues to expand, there have been no efforts to give that money back to tutors. In addition, Tutor.com expects more from its tutors than it is willing to pay its tutors to do. 2. Tutor/Student Interaction: Tutors are expected to cater to students, even when students are being rude and disrespectful. This does not help the students, yet Tutor.com pushes compliance with this rule. 3. Students: Some students are not willing to do the work; they come to Tutor.com solely to have their work done for them, and when this does not happen, they leave bad ratings, which effects incentive pay. 4. Classroom: There is always something wrong with the classroom, be it the white board, chat, file sharing, web browser, or classroom tools, and it takes tech support a significant amount of time to resolve the issues. 5. Tutor/Tutor Interaction: Tutors do not interact with each other on any level. Tutor.com has not taken any steps to bring contractors together; I assume this is because as long as we're fragmented, we cannot stand up against Tutor.com. 6. Promotions: These are supposed to be based on the number of sessions conducted and your ratings, but often are held back by individual mentors. Some mentors are rather nitpicky and hold tutors to their own personal standards rather than those of Tutor.com 7. Lack of Individuality: Because Tutor.com wants to maintain an anonymous learning environment, there are no chances for tutors to present themselves truthfully. Unless a tutor has an ethnic name, there is no indication that the tutor is anything but White, as presented in the 2 avatars, male and female, that we have to choose from. 8. Training: There are a number of tutors that are not skilled in the areas in which they tutor, and this presents problems for the tutors that have to come behind them and correct their misinformation. 9. References: Tutor.com does not offer these, though it would be possible to do so. One of the benefits of having longevity on a job are the references that come with familiarity with a person's work. When I apply for a job, there is nobody here that is willing to be contacted about my work performance. This is a truly bad aspect of the job, as if my current employer (if you will) refuses to vouch for me, why would any company want to hire me?

2.0
Feb 26, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Work from home. You can make money in that time you would normally spend watching pointless TikToks.

Cons

They keep adding responsibilities without increasing compensation. Recently, they announced pay increases for about 60 subjects. However, rather than just increase pay, they have to "take" from somewhere else; they made it more difficult to achieve the monthly bonuses, increasing the number of hours needed to get the bonus by 7 and tacking on a provision that requires tutors be available to accept concurrent sessions (tutoring 2 people on different sessions at once) for an increasing percentage on each bonus level. In addition, if the subject you were tutoring (and the level you were tutoring at) is already at $15.00/hr or more, you didn't get a pay increase. Therefore, for many employees, pay has actually decreased. In a time where rampant inflation caused companies to need to increase wages to help employees earn a living wage, these imbeciles are the only ones who are decreasing pay. In fact, if you move to a state where minimum wage is lower, they will reduce your hourly pay for your "waiting rate" (the rate of pay you receive when you are scheduled and available, but no students have shown up yet to be tutored) to that minimum wage. Many companies do "salary studies" to ensure their salaries are competitive based on job title and employee location. This company's equivalent of a salary study is, "what's the lowest we can pay these maggots based on where they live?" They continue to enact tutor-unfriendly policies, and when they get rid of policies, they don't announce it; they just drop them from the manual and hope you don't notice so that you continue to comply. Finally, this company's management is atrocious. I'm speaking specifically about "Learning Services." Quality Specialist Managers are either completely ineffectual or they micromanage their quality specialists. If you're a tutor, your experience will be governed solely by how reasonable your quality specialist is. Some quality specialists (and senior quality specialists) seem to spend their time finding reasons for you not to get promoted to higher tutor and quality specialist levels. They will pick apart the most miniscule things and expect perfection as an excuse to keep holding you back while the Senior Quality Specialists and Quality Specialist managers will enable that behavior. On the other hand, the requirements to become a tutor now are so laughably easy that they probably felt the need to "tighten up" on the newest tutors while letting experienced tutors go for practically a year without a review. And no sooner did they introduce new requirements for quality specialists, including a revamp of the entire QS process, now they're changing the quality specialist roles entirely to have personnel dedicated to one (and only one) of five roles. I'm convinced that the head of learning services throws a dart at a board and wherever it lands she decides that's going to be the management strategy for the quarter.

1.0
Dec 22, 2023

Very terrible and unreliable

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

WFH is the only pro

Cons

You are hired to be placed over several undetermined months of probationary period. Be careful! They can terminate your employment without any reason just because your assigned quality specialist continuously wrote unfairly prejudiced reports regarding how they want you to tutor students. It's very ambiguous. Students rated tutors 5-star, but the quality specialist wrote 500+ words criticizing how badly you tutored the student, even though the student left comments saying that they finally understood the subject. It's ridiculous. They made the rules and you need to follow the rules to tutor. The worst thing is that there is no SOP and standards about how the rules should be obeyed. All comments are very subjective and biased.

Viewing 70 - 72 of 595 Reviews

Glassdoor has 943 Tutor.com reviews submitted anonymously by Tutor.com employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Tutor.com is right for you.