employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Stanford University

Is this your company?

Stanford University reviews

4.3

82% would recommend to a friend

(5,702 total reviews)
avatar

Jonathan Levin

83% approve of CEO

69% positive business outlook

Stanford University has an employee rating of 4.3 out of 5 stars, based on 5,702 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an excellent working experience there. The Stanford University employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Educación industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

6K reviews
1.0
Nov 18, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great benefits, but there's a caveat

Cons

Stanford is a great place if you're looking for security. But, you’ll hate yourself in the long-term for sacrificing your motivation and desire to challenge yourself and grow if you stay here. If you're looking for professional growth, it is not the place. If you're looking for a great income, it is not the place. If you're looking to have an impact with your creativity, it is not the place. If you’re looking to make a decent yet lower-than SF Bay Area wage while having great security, it is that place. This is how you may get screwed. On one hand, Stanford tells you that since you have amazing benefits, your salary can't be too high. Then they wonder why the turnover rate is insane. Once you begin and learn that the previous person was making a lot more than you, you automatically begin to shut-down. Your performance plummets and you begin running like a rabbit to get the hell out of there. They're simply not direct or honest in their hiring process. The salary range they provide (if they still do that, I haven’t been a part of Stanford for sometime), is extremely misleading. Whatever job you take, expect your salary to be on the very low-end of that scale. Also, expect whatever job you take to be directly affected by your previous position. If you went from a gardner to a Doctor, Stanford HR will insist to pay you based on your gardening income. This hardly happens, but you get the picture. If you're making salary X, it will be below market. Why? They tell you that your benefits account for an additional 30% of "income." Well, OK that sounds great right? Then if you were to get that same position as an hourly staff, do you think they would pay you your original hourly income plus that 30%? Dream on. They will tell you that what you're making per hour is too high. You'll most likely make your annual salary's hourly rate even when you have no benefits. This way, they pay their full-times employees little by telling them they have great benefits and also keep their hourly employees with low wages by touting their "high" hourly wages. Most of the benefits are accounting tricks. They say you get X value of benefits, when they probably pay a tenth of that to the benefit provider. So, they screw you over and still expect you to thank them. They’re not hiring idiots, but they treat you like one. Example: You're making 100k with benefits. 100k comes out to ~$50 per hour. Uncle Sam, takes around ~35% (maybe more depending on your circumstance). So, you're actual hourly rate is around $37. With Stanford's benefits, that's not a bad deal at all assuming that you're getting paid the right salary for that job. But, you'll likely make $70k ($35/hour) at Stanford because they inflate benefits. The $35/hour after taxes is around $25/hour. So you just lost over $10 per hour because of the way they calculate your salary. So, you decide why not work strictly as an hourly employee? I'll at least make more per hour since they'll use the same calculation to add the 30% of benefits to my hourly income right? Wrong. If you were hired as hourly, you may be lucky to earn $40/hour without benefits for a job with $35 with benefits that should actually pay $50/hour. You ask them, wait a second what about the fact that this job has no benefits? They tell you that the typical hourly of a similar position is $35 (They don’t mention benefits) and you're getting overpaid at $40/hour. Basically, when it benefits them to include benefits so they don't have to pay full-time employees well, they do. When it benefits them to solely focus on your hourly to pay their hourly employees little, they do the same. As someone else already mentioned, this is a great place to learn, grow and move on (either to a higher position at Stanford or another place). If you decide to stay complacent and stay in the same position for more than two years, you'll hate yourself forever. Don't buy into the idea that Stanford is an educational non-profit. IAnyone who has worked here knows how much the university spends on Palm Trees and how much they shell out for their execs.

2.0
Apr 15, 2024

Proceed with Cautions!!!!

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

1. Literally making a difference in people's lives (Healthcare) 2. Co-workers are reserved and minding their own business 3. Surrounded by a lot of smart people whom working on making breakthroughs in their research. 4. Pretty good benefits (for non-remote) 5. Job stability

Cons

1. Management team tend to be a lot of micro managers / narcissistic personalities. 2. Technical skills are well below industry standard. There's a lot of managers that sending emails day and night to "push" for things to be done because they can't and don't know how to do it themselves 3. Some teams are violating labor laws for instance, directors asking you about what you are doing on your sick day off and refuse to grant vacation when you are at max. 4. HR team is not helpful in addressing above and part of me hope that they get struck with a lawsuit for ignoring all of these ill-labor practices. Fortunate for them that those of us who can easily find another job will just do so and not stay to deal with this. 5. There's a lot of politics so unless you want to be in the clicks or just want to work your way doing the same thing until retirement.

avatar
Stanford University Response
2y
Thank you for taking the time to provide your feedback. We take your concerns very seriously. We’d like to follow up but need additional information. If you are willing to provide more specific information, we recommend that you contact University Human Resources, Employee & Labor Relations at stanfordelr@stanford.edu, so these concerns can be addressed.
1.0
Sep 16, 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Pretty campus, good PTO policies

Cons

I came to Stanford from the private sector, as so many people told me it was a "great place to work." I got there and was shocked by the utter ineptitude of my colleagues and managers. It was like stepping into a third world country. It turns out a lot of people working there either a) have been there for 20+ years and don't know how the rest of the professional world works or b) could not get a job anywhere else. I'm not kidding: I actually had several people tell me that Stanford was their employer of last resort because no one else wanted them after getting laid off. One important thing no one tells you when you're interviewing, is that there is no mobility. At all. Been stuck with a horrible manager for 5 years? Too bad. Been working below your capacity for the last decade? Suck it up. Going here was the worst decision of my life. I was lied to about my position, forced to lay people off unnecessarily by leaders who don't understand numbers, reported to someone who couldn't manage his way out of a paper bag, and surrounded by miserable, openly hostile colleagues who wanted out but weren't competent enough to get a job elsewhere. Save yourself.

Viewing 4 - 6 of 5,702 Reviews

Glassdoor has 6,399 Stanford University reviews submitted anonymously by Stanford University employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Stanford University is right for you.