QA reviews

3.3

52% would recommend to a friend

(952 total reviews)
avatar

Josh Hubbert

57% approve of CEO

39% positive business outlook

QA has an employee rating of 3.3 out of 5 stars, based on 952 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The QA employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Educación industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

952 reviews
5.0
Aug 13, 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Career development, great managers and brilliant colleagues.

Cons

The KPIS and sales revenue can be stressful to meet if starting out.

avatar
QA Response
7y
Thanks so much for the review. I'm glad you are enjoying things and that you are being well supported by your managers and colleagues. I can completely appreciate that sales targets can be daunting to start with - hopefully you are able to talk them through with your manager to ensure they are realistic and that you understand how to break them down and realistically achieve them. I hope to meet you when I am in the Glasgow office in October. Mary Sansom Director - Corporate Brand
5.0
Aug 9, 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Lots of great people Energetic Great opportunities in Digital

Cons

Bit chaotic Needs more mgt time

avatar
QA Response
7y
A 5 star employee review - that's great, I'm glad you are liking it here! Thanks for taking the time to share your thoughts. You will be pleased to hear that worrying about our people is my no.1 concern. It's where it all starts. If you have ideas or suggestions of best practice, perhaps based on other organisations you have worked at, I would welcome the opportunity to hear them. You can find my contact details on the QA directory. Hopefully hear from you soon. Mary Sansom - Director of Group Comms
1.0
Aug 8, 2018

Downward Spiral

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Company has seen much growth and expansion. They have a strong reputation in learning but this is dissipating rapidly. Talks the talk and some nice offices in London which is not reflected elsewhere. On the face of it, the benefits look good but when I tried to use my training days and allowance to support me, this was refused.

Cons

Weak management team who look after each other. If your face fits and you ‘put up and shut up’ you may progress. Complete lack of process They teach industry best practice such as Prince 2 but there is no evidence whatsoever of adherence to best practice principles in-house For a training provider, the opportunity for training is extremely limited because they are heavily under resourced. Masters at promising much and not delivering to clients and employees also

avatar
QA Response
7y
Gosh - this made for some painful reading. I am so sorry, I want all QA employees to be as satisfied and happy as I am working here, so it upsets me when I hear about staff that aren't happy. I am frustrated and angry for you. Your review shows that we still have much to do. I appreciate that having moved on you may not want to share the specifics of your feedback with me, but you can contact me directly on mary.sansom@qa.com and I would welcome the opportunity to ask you some questions and learn from our mistakes. I do want to pick up on 2 specific points in your review here to explain some of the things we are doing in this space. 1) Weak management team - we know we face challenges here, and it is something we are investing in over the next year. We have grown extremely quickly and so our management layer has had to grow quickly too. Not every manager is as strong as the other. We will be investing in more formal training and support for our managers to ensure everyone is as strong and supportive as they should be. 2) Staff access to training - I am keen to understand the specifics relating to your request for training. Your experience should not be the norm (which I know is little consolation) . We provide our employees with internal and external training and managers are meant to allow staff at least three days for training and/or development time per year. Managers do ask that staff are considerate of busy times of the year and team holidays/absences when requesting the time to attend training so this may have been the case, but if not then, again, I apologise. I really am very grateful to you for taking the time to share your experience with me so that our teams can work hard to ensure it doesn't happen to anyone else. Kind Regards, Mary - Director of Group Comms
Viewing 775 - 777 of 952 Reviews

Glassdoor has 1,048 QA reviews submitted anonymously by QA employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if QA is right for you.