OSCE reviews

3.8

78% would recommend to a friend

(265 total reviews)

Helga Maria Schmid

73% approve of CEO

59% positive business outlook

OSCE has an employee rating of 3.8 out of 5 stars, based on 265 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The OSCE employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Administración y consultoría industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

265 reviews
2.0
Mar 15, 2018

OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

For those who work in the east, you are really along the front line. The situation is quite similar to a UN military observer mission. There is a decent amount of leave. Board and lodging allowance [BLA] is comparable to UN mission subsistence allowance [MSA]

Cons

Most people are on seconded contracts, so their overall salary and benefits depend greatly on their national governments. Some countries pay nothing but the BLA is much more than the average salary at home and the BLA goes a long way for them. Some countries pay the equivalent to what a civil servant, diplomat or police officer would make. Indeed, they may be seconding such people. Others, like Canada, pay a small honorarium, that is a fraction of what a civil makes. The mission makes poor use of its people. Often, very incompetent people are put in senior positions, principally for the sake of gender but also sometimes for "national balance". Many monitors are treated as cannon fodder by their countries, without many benefits or systems for redress, even though they are the ones risking theirs lives. Since the Mission insists that the armored SUVs be driven by a monitor [2 per car] and only those with a C license can drive, usually the people with knowledge and experience are driving the cars and the lesser experienced are leading the patrols. Most of the female monitors refuse to drive the armoured cars even if they have a C license [as all North American and British drivers automatically do] and quickly ask for an inside job away from the frontline. Nonetheless, there are constant annoying gender sessions on political correctness [as in a totalitarian state] The Mission monitors issues of "human dimension" but has almost zero capacity to do anything about it. The freedom of movement is often very limited on the separatist side of the frontline, They can often be very threatening. For those patrolling the frontline, you have to be able to deal with small arms and artillery exchanges taking place nearby. Most of the leadership in Kiev has no previous mission experience. The people working in the teams in the west are like in a different mission with far less risk and responsibility. Preference is given to females in getting these positions. Though this mission may be a good introduction to missions for someone starting out or perhaps something to do for someone on a pension, it is kind of a dead end for professionals still in the prime of their careers.

4.0
Oct 22, 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

1. Interesting work focused on field missions. 2. Reasonably efficient. Less bureaucratic than the UN. 3. Good HR teams to help onboard new staff, assist in disputes, etc. 4. Competitive salary. Most positions are seconded and seconded salaries depend on nationality. Poorer countries usually have no or low salaries, so those staff rely on the BLA from the OSCE Mission (usually competitive with salaries in their countries). Richer countries tend to pay salaries equivalent to the UN, sometimes more. 5. Excellent Van Breda health insurance. Seconded staff must pay their own premiums; however, many seconding countries reimburse their nationals so health insurance is effectively included. 6. "Non career organization." Many on Glassdoor have complained that the OSCE has term limits of 7-10 years. I think it makes the organization LESS bureaucratic with LESS nepotism and LESS lazy "lifers" in positions for too long. One generation ago is was not unusual to spend your entire career at a single company. Nowadays people change jobs more frequently, even change careers. 7-10 years is plenty of time with one organization. I know OSCE seconded staff members who have been promoted within their term limit. If you work hard, learn quickly and make yourself indispensable you can more upwards. 7. Smart, diverse colleagues. I've appreciated almost everyone I worked with at the OSCE. Some are truly exceptional and impressive.

Cons

1. No pension plan as a "non career organization". I urge everyone to start saving early, especially when your employer does not contribute. 2. Some bad apples. I've interacted with a few "HR mistakes", i.e. staff members who should not have been in their position... unqualified for the position, really bad English (lingua franca of the OSCE), or egregious personalities.

1.0
Dec 5, 2013

Negative

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Nice office location, young team

Cons

No clear job responsibilities, overly bureaucratic and ineffective in result, no training provided

Viewing 1 - 3 of 265 Reviews

Glassdoor has 350 OSCE reviews submitted anonymously by OSCE employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if OSCE is right for you.