employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

General Atomics

Is this your company?

General Atomics reviews

3.9

72% would recommend to a friend

(1,971 total reviews)
avatar

Neal Blue

78% approve of CEO

69% positive business outlook

General Atomics has an employee rating of 3.9 out of 5 stars, based on 1,971 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The General Atomics employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Aeroespacial y defensa industry (3.6 stars).

Reviews by job title

2K reviews
4.0
Aug 14, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- variety of technical challenges & opportunities - company's mission & products are meaningful - strong performing employees are generally recognized & rewarded - meaningful work: I can reflect on my time at the company and easily identify many ways that I personally have added value to the company & its products - the Predator family of remotely-operated aircraft systems is a really cool product and awesome to be a part of! - amazing learning opportunities from many leaders who are responsible for the company's success this far - easy to move around within the company to pursue growth opportunities

Cons

- despite significant growth over the past decade, many elements within the company continue to resist *growing up* to a level of maturity that should be expected of an organization this size - the company's limited budget for annual raises over the past ~5 years causes the average employee's compensation to fall behind market value within a few years unless the employee or his/her manager takes specific action to maintain equity - persistence of small-company behavior: e.g. senior executives remain too involved in detailed design decisions, rather than establishing clear requirements and empowering the design teams to achieve them - mediocre process definition / implementation / consistency: too much reinventing the wheel - company is struggling with recent enterprise-wide MRP software change to SAP

3.0
Jun 29, 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good benefits: 9/80, the pension, CAL, Christmas shut-down.

Cons

The company makes a solid product but it promotes and retains incompetent people. The HR department is no different. The department is quite large and has turned over almost 100% in the past couple years. There are a lot nasty people where favoritism is rampant.

2.0
Oct 20, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

There were smart people that did care about doing a good job at one point in time, and there are still pockets of good teams left. Leadership is out of touch with how much work everyone has, so you arent pushed hard at all to collect a pay check. I knew lots of Sr. Program Managers that didn't know how to create pivot tables, yet seemed to run their entire meetings off of them. If you are above average intelligence, you will be praised for being smart and it will look good on you, but you will also be given 2x the workload of your peers. If you are young this is a good opportunity if you work hard, wear many hats, and are self-driven - just promise me you leave in 2-3 years else you become part of the old guard problem. Pockets of good people and good teams that arent toxic, but your mileage may vary.

Cons

The smart people left, the people that care left, and all that was left are managers that have been there for 10+ years, where will the drive an innovation come from? With no new major contracts, end of life contracts signed for the 2 bread and butter platforms (GE / Pred B) the future GA-ASI does not look like the current GA-ASI. Company has to change drastically, but refuses to acknowledge the change in the industry and customer demands, There were many teams and people with big titles that are woefully under-experienced that react to difficulties or ideas different than theirs that respond with a toxic defensive nature that erodes any trust and teambuilding. They focus more on winning conversations that turned into an argument rather than focusing on being a good steward of company capital and ensuring growth. Also like any defense company, 15% of any department exists solely to do work that they themselves said was mandatory. If its not in the FAR/DFARS/SOW then delete than QMS and stop doing pointless work.

Viewing 34 - 36 of 1,971 Reviews

Glassdoor has 2,262 General Atomics reviews submitted anonymously by General Atomics employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if General Atomics is right for you.