employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Frost & Sullivan

Is this your company?

Frost & Sullivan reviews

3.2

42% would recommend to a friend

(1,336 total reviews)

David Frigstad

26% approve of CEO

24% positive business outlook

Frost & Sullivan has an employee rating of 3.2 out of 5 stars, based on 1,336 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Frost & Sullivan employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Administración y consultoría industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

1K reviews
3.0
Mar 9, 2010
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

autonomy to do your own thing if you are succesful, quick career progression, enabling young proffesionals to get involved in important projects, good team working spirit

Cons

low pay, few benefits, commissions are not competitive and do not reflect industry standards, too many product/service/propositions/initiatives are being introduced by top management that confuse the core capabilities of the company, no true commitment to quality deliverables.

4.0
Mar 4, 2010
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

You can make a lot of commission if successful in sales. If you have a good idea for doing things dfifferently, they will let you run with it. Some really bright people. Friendly place to work. Ex employees often return.

Cons

Initiatives from the US get imposed on you.

1.0
Mar 2, 2010
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Frost is a great place for beginners to cut their teeth in the consulting space. Due to a lack of resources, junior staff will be relied on heavily, giving them exposure to work that they may not get in more established consulting firms. The company is a great place to work for those that want a place to hide and tread water. In Asia people are rarely fired, and the company is one of the few places to my knowledge where consultants and analysts with limited skills and drive will be able to find a home. Mediocre staff are placed on an internal merry-go-round, where they are switched from position to position, after demonstrating that they cannot meet the requirements of a particular role. Much like a rerun of “Friends”, the process keeps repeating itself over and over again. Again this is a pro as it benefits mediocre employees, who otherwise would have joined the unemployment queue months before.

Cons

Analysts and consultants with capabilities, drive and skill will not find any reason to utilise the afore-mentioned attributes. Few bonuses are payed to consultants and analysts, although certain bonuses based on specific conditions are penned into most employee contracts. However the chances of most of these conditions being met by the company are about as high as the chances that this author will win “American Idol”, so for the sake of this article one can consider bonuses to be non-existent. Staff have no incentive to deliver quality work, and more often than not, the work produced is endemically below industry standards, and sadly, far below client expectations. Even more sadly (depending on your point of view) management has come to accept this sub-standard level of quality. Consequently no concrete steps are put in place to correct this issue, resulting in the low quality of consulting work being joked about ad nauseum by staff in the company. Few competent senior managers are present. Most senior appointments are drawn from the ranks of current staff, which seriously reduces the professionalism of the management as few, if any, have management experience in any proper professional organisation. Unfortunately not only does this strangle the growth of the organisation, it also results in the best and brightest mid- to senior-level analysts and consultants fleeing the company. This generally happens once they realise that demonstrating hard work and skill will not result in promotions to positions of responsibility due to the presence of entrenched management. The company has recently been battered by the resignations of capable mid-tier staff members, putting even further stress and strain on the remaining staff. Training is non-existent and far below the standard expected of a consulting firm. Training often consists of throwing staff, unguided by senior management, into projects where they have little knowledge or expertise and expecting them to figure out what to do. While this might, from a perverse survival-of-the-fittest point of view, make sense, it cannot really be called training. The poor quality of senior management does not provide much opportunity for mentoring, although very junior staff may still find the occasional mentor in the company to learn from.

Viewing 1252 - 1254 of 1,336 Reviews

Glassdoor has 1,604 Frost & Sullivan reviews submitted anonymously by Frost & Sullivan employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Frost & Sullivan is right for you.