Flutter Entertainment reviews

Past one year experienced toooo many changes, lack of direction, indecisive, incomprehendable, clueless and mostly invisible India leaders. Hiring team is only doing good(for themselves) by promising the sky and pushing the new recruits down the hill, after which it becomes fend for yourself. Hyderabad site is not the focus of flutter company and is only a cost saving centre mainly focusing on customer service jobs. No objective and thorough decisions and right processes to go by. Everyone is busy doing things very important but don't have any clue of outcome and the right way to fix things. Company seems to have quickly grown without any maturity in process, policy, people and leaders. Even smaller similiar GCCs have something good to talk about but here....

I have been working with Flutter Entertainment, and my experience has been extremely disappointing. The mid and top-level management operate from the UK and appear relaxed, mainly because the company’s business model thrives on gambling — essentially profiting from the hard-earned money of the common man. However, the India management has taken this a step further by misusing company funds on unnecessary expenses and lavish parties. To cover these avoidable costs, the UK leadership ends up approving layoffs in India, targeting hardworking employees at lower levels, while the higher-level Indian management — lacking real business knowledge — secures their own positions and pockets. For example, the company offered a so-called “wellbeing benefit” of ₹18,000 to attract new employees. Naturally, many employees submitted bills (sometimes even dummy ones) to claim it, as it was clearly positioned as an entitlement. But now, instead of owning up to poor policy design, the management has started using this benefit as an excuse to terminate employees — punishing them for something the company itself encouraged. This reflects the overall toxic culture, poor governance, and lack of accountability in Flutter Entertainment, where genuine contributors are sacrificed while mismanagement continues at the top.