City Year reviews

3.3

50% would recommend to a friend

(2,284 total reviews)
avatar

Michael Brown

48% approve of CEO

37% positive business outlook

City Year has an employee rating of 3.3 out of 5 stars, based on 2,284 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The City Year employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Educación industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

2K reviews
2.0
Feb 25, 2010

The McDonald's of Community Service

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

City year has a great idea: give community members an opportunity to give back and support struggling schools, using the energy and idealism of youth for a tangible goal. There is also a lot of opportunity to design and implement your own projects-- however, this is both a pro and a con because it is made possible by a general acceptance of mediocrity and failure.

Cons

It's possible that City Year started out as the sort of participatory, energetic, competent organization that could really meet their goals-- a group of passionate young people who reject the apathy of their generation and work hard for others. But, even if it ever were such an organization, its mass production has now led to an incompetent shell of it's ideals of civic engagement. Employees (volunteers) are required to wear costumes daily-- t shirts or polos covered in branding from sponsoring organizations, and chunky Timberland boots (another sponsor), in red and yellow McDonald's franchise colors. Corps members should expect to spend a considerable amount of time selling the City Year brand-- from making sure any and all documents are covered in CY and sponsor logos to actual cold calls and fundraising. A considerable amount of time and energy goes into public military-like calisthenics that clearly have nothing to do with any aspect of helping children. The trainings for the first several weeks of service are devoted to imbuing in corps members the "culture" of City Year, which is passed on the form of "founding stories" and myriad inspirational quotes in the handbook. This "culture" talks with dewy-eyed admiration of democracy and participatory engagement-- yet doesn't leave room for volunteers to share and implement THEIR goals, and, worse, certainly doesn't make space for the people CY's supposed to be helping to ask for what THEY want. The few real and genuinely useful activities that corps members do, which in my opinion is limited to one-on-one tutoring in struggling schools, is painfully limited by insufficient training and devotion of time to more public (and thus potentially fundraising) efforts-- the big service days, calisthenics, filling out endless forms on childrens' "improvements" to show the sponsors, etc. I only spent about 4 hours out of my 40 hour weeks tutoring. Other CY activities in school were extremely poorly run, and often resulted in poor relations with teachers and the administration. As an 18 year old out of high school, I was left to manage an after school program for 30 children for four months when my supervisor quit, despite repeated requests for assistance from my superiors. This sort of situation was common. My biggest complaint with working for City Year is the disillusionment and lack of appreciation for individuality and honesty in the franchise. Civil service is not one-size-fits-all, and just because you say you're doing "good" doesn't mean you are. Or, in fact, that you're not doing actually harm by setting poor examples for they children who look to you as role models by being incompetent, brainwashed, and self-righteous.

1.0
Jul 11, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The kids. Your teacher (if you're lucky). Your team (if you're lucky). GOING TO THE WHITE HOUSE to see OBAMA and CLINTON (thank you, Americorps!)

Cons

I remember looking and reading the reviews on glassdoor a year ago. I saw many things about the service year being difficult, disorganized and time consuming, but did not anticipate just what I was getting myself into. The past year was hard, but in the worst way possible. I did not grow from the experience, but instead learned how a nonprofit that has good intentions can be run in unproductive ways and how a school should NOT be run. First there was "Basic Training Academy" where I cannot tell you one thing that I internalized other than City Year's cult-like culture. Only those with extroverted personalities were highlighted and they made it seem as though only those who accepted the culture would be able to build relationships and have the best impact on their students. A good chunk of the trainings were led by individuals who found statistics on wikipedia and regurgitated information from a cool article they read a month ago. Many of the questions corps members had about their school experience were unanswerable because "it depends on your school" or they literally did not have an answer. Once we finally got to our school, our Program Manager(PM) made all of these empty promises that she never followed up on like, always standing up for us and being our voice in times of trouble. Most days she showed up late because she was "flexing" and then she always had last minute emails to send/busy work she could have done at home but chose to do at school (I won't even mention her snapchat addiction). One of the worst parts is that corps members are expected to be in the classroom ALL DAY, do small groups, transition classes, have recess duty, run after school programs and more, while the Team Leader (TL) and PM sit in a room and gossip all day. When corps members bring up an issue we are treated like abandoned step children who are incapable of making decisions. Our concerns were often met with pushback as though our 40 hours a week inside of a classroom where a teacher appears to be a pedophile, are ignored. Our monthly trainings although are a break from the long days in school are pointless, you are told by leadership that you're never doing enough to help the kids. And given the amount of reflection we are required to have/share you would think that your voice/opinion was actually valuable, wrong! CY staff is full of former [ineffective] teachers, former corps members who haven't found their calling (or want to relive their college years) and inexperienced/entry level professionals who think they know everything there is to know about making a positive difference on a child's life with no help from CMs. You are expected to be in class for a whole day, meet with your small groups, have lunch buddies, prep, turn in trackers, get yelled at by school staff, plan with your teacher, manage recess and so much more. Let's not even talk about the bright red jacket/City Year uniform you are expected to wear every single day. That uniform is trash, it removes any sense of individuality you thought you had and is only good for getting those really tough stains out your tub and toilet. THOSE POOR STUDENTS... Looking back on my CY experience (as i train to become a REAL teacher), I feel terrible that my students and partner-teacher had to put up with my presence for a whole year. I honestly feel like my ignorance throughout my time made my teacher less effective and students ended up relying on me to help them with everything rather than become independent problem solvers. CMs are poorly trained for a few weeks and then they're thrown into a classroom. CY says that CMs are going to tutor students in reading and math, but the training is so bad, who knows what's going on in those small groups. And who knows how CMs are utilized in the classroom. Most times they end up with the role of a teachers aid or disciplinarian and students become dependent on them. CY is generally in low performing, underrepresented minority schools, throwing inexperienced CMs into a classroom is not going to suddenly 'save the day' and melt away the heritage of inequality that these students are branded with. In fact, I would go as far to say that CY is maintaining the achievement gap that these students are cursed with from birth. Every year there are new corps members to train and the students have to build all new relationships, hurting their socioemotional skills/ ability to build relationships with adults. If anyone is truly looking to close the inequality gap in public school education, invest in QUALITY TEACHERS, and then CY's existence will not be necessary.

1.0
May 25, 2016

Program built off the backs of corps members!

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Relationships you build with students and other corps members

Cons

Treated as less than volunteers although technically you work as employees. If there's a death in your family or an illness you are expected to either use your "12" days to leave or take a 5 day minimum leave with NO pay. Forced to work 11 sometimes 12 hour days and teach an after-school program that is inefficient and on a steady decline in terms of attendance. You are forced to be puppets for donors and potential sponsors, collect data, act as guinea pigs for several new things they want to implement on the students. They also value data and donations over the students and corps members. You're responsible for your own housing in a city with the most expensive housing yet only paid $5 an hour! Staff is incompetent and horrible at communication! The higher ups are oblivious to what the students of East San Jose need along with what generates an effective corps. They burn you out and cause mental breakdowns. STAY AWAY IF YOU ARE NOT GOOD AT HIGH STRESS OR PEOPLE WHO CARE NOTHING ABOUT YOU.

Viewing 4 - 6 of 2,284 Reviews

Glassdoor has 2,493 City Year reviews submitted anonymously by City Year employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if City Year is right for you.