Avaya reviews

3.3

47% would recommend to a friend

(3,580 total reviews)
avatar

Alan Masarek

46% approve of CEO

30% positive business outlook

Avaya has an employee rating of 3.3 out of 5 stars, based on 3,580 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Avaya employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Tecnologías de la información industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

4K reviews
1.0
Aug 19, 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I spent 9 years at Avaya - when I joined it was a company at the top of its game. Good salaries, and ability to earn a reasonable bonus.

Cons

Then it all went wrong. It went into private ownership by an investment company that makes its money by cutting off the chaff and selling what it can. They put Kennedy in as CEO and the company has gone downhill year on year ever since, so bad was the performance they asked employees to take furlough (unpaid leave) then at the same time bought out bankrupt Nortel. (as well as paying Kennedy a huge bonus for saving money) All the Senior staff who took Nortel to bankruptcy were put into senior positions in Avaya – what a surprise what happed next. From that point on the company has rapidly declined – it was correctly sized – suddenly too many buildings, too many employees, duplicate product lines and a huge legacy of old Nortel kit to support. The story of buying huge market share of all the old Nortel Meridian installs failed to materialize - Enterporises were not going to be caught again. Straggling to move forward with an R&D spend drastically reduced, and has ended up with a product line that is now years behind the curve … voice has fallen way behind CISCO and contact centre totally lost to Genesys. Spending what little money they had developing Flair – when the world used iPads, then buying Scopia video conferencing … just too late again Avaya had already lost the video race at that time, as Cisco buying Tanderg killed that opportunity. The Gartner report even has them fallen out of the leaders quadrant – lowest ever position. With a debt of almost $6Bn that is an all time industry record, so high they cannot even make the payments – the company went into Bankruptcy. (Chapter 11) Kennedy still claiming all was well …. Finally they have replaced him as CEO ….. Chirico has been put in place, worryingly he advises he is keeping Kennedy as an adviser …… on what? … how to bankrupt a company. I hope for the employees that remain, that Chirico is his own man and does not follow the advice from Kennedy. What for the future, can UC and CC still be separate players – having tried to split and sell parts off (unsuccessfully) can they remain together. The product needs a huge overhaul, needs to get out of hardware, and focus on software, reliance on custom Linux servers is not the way the market has moved. Maybe it is too late to change.

3.0
Aug 28, 2016

Global Director

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Excellent telecommunications history and strong platform in the industry with an incredible customer base. Brilliant people in the R&D who mostly came from Bell Labs (an icon in technology development) who innovate solutions beyond capabilities of most competitors in the industry.

Cons

Always looking to do more with less. Unreasonably high expectations at all levels (especially below executive) without the proper dollar investment to match. Takes to long to bring new innovative solutions to market causing company to miss the window of opportunity for hitting the market strong ahead of competitors.

2.0
Aug 23, 2016

What the what?

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Work from home option is great for independent workers that don't enjoy micromanagement (dependent on manager) - For the most part allows for creative thinking but not necessarily in execution due to restraints as a company - Technology is solid with fantastic legacy and future potential (if led correctly) - Trust in my key co-workers to help get the job done - Great experience for workers that like to navigate an uncertain mine field and learn to manage and work with ambiguity (I mean this with no irony for the most part) - Great mentorship from team members that I trust - Great people, amazing learning opportunity from different segments if you are able to break from the silos - Extensive channel of VARs - Leader in pushing for E911 laws to be passed

Cons

- Lack of direction from the top due to ever changing leadership with made up positions and large paychecks - Antiquated tools to work effectively due to operational cost cuts (SFDC, SAP, Walker all running old versions on laptops from the turn of the century) - Overcomplicated processes and compensation stipulations that seem to be put in there to suck your soul away or not pay you - Some workers are not held accountable even in management positions therefore there is a gap in communication, knowledge, and execution putting strain on reliability. Some people manage up very well but not work laterally. - High turnover in AM's lead to large gaps in coverage and product knowledge as well as relationships with BP's and customers - Low morale due to the Scrooge McDuck penny pinching from the top causing seemingly random layoffs and poor benefits - BP community that can easily take advantage of the desperation of the company to make money due to the high pressure on the salesforce to make commits QoQ to keep the company afloat - Due to the breadth of the portfolio, it leads to a breadth of skill in the BP community. Some are excellent, top of the line businesses that practice with ethics and are willing to grow and adapt to industry changes while others I wouldn't trust with connecting two cans with string, be able to read a finance sheet, and lack fortitude to resolve issues - Debt, Debt, Debt.

Viewing 73 - 75 of 3,580 Reviews

Glassdoor has 4,091 Avaya reviews submitted anonymously by Avaya employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Avaya is right for you.