Avaya reviews

3.3

47% would recommend to a friend

(3,579 total reviews)
avatar

Alan Masarek

46% approve of CEO

30% positive business outlook

Avaya has an employee rating of 3.3 out of 5 stars, based on 3,579 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Avaya employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Tecnologías de la información industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

4K reviews
2.0
Feb 29, 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Like any company, there are good people eho work there. There is a global development program for early career folks who, if they are willing to come into the workforce way under market value, can gain experience and work with leadership to build business acumen and resume.

Cons

Senior leadership is facing a very steep uphill battle to transform Avayas brand into a software and services company. They are forced to continue layoffs, and the company is losing solid talent, quickly. Employees are getting low relative contributions on their reviews to justify letting them go.

3.0
Sep 25, 2015

Channels Director

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Market leader in some legacy segments and still benefiting from its installed base which includes large and profitable corporations in all theaters.

Cons

No vision. Lots of internal pressures generate an unfriendly internal culture. Massive layoffs seem to be the only response to troubled financial situation.

3.0
Apr 13, 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Avaya is a big company (~8k employees at about $3B a year) with a large customer base, so there is some stability as a result. My managers and teammates are very hard working, knowledgeable, and I have almost complete autonomy in the work I do - as long as I get results. I only interact with my boss if I need help with an issue, so NO micro-management, which is awesome. Compensation is higher than at smaller companies for sure. Annual rankings/reviews are very minimal effort. (Rankings however are forced relative distribution, which seems unfair when all team members have met or exceeded their personal work goals.) I've received $10k per year raises every 2 years or so, which actually makes it harder to look for work elsewhere as I am relatively overpaid for the level of work I perform. There is (currently) a fixed 401k match of 1/2 of 5%, so 2.5% if you save 5% or more. I have a feeling this will become company revenue based once again, which means it will cease to exist because we almost always fall short of revenue goals. Most roles are salaried and have DTO (Designated Time Off), which essentially means unlimited sick and vacation days as long as your work gets done. Folks in Europe take off a month at a time, as they do. Depending on their role, most employees can work from home most days of the week and don't have to be in the office for any prescribed hours. There is theoretically a requirement to be in the office at least 2-3 days per week. In my role, I usually take calls from home from 7am to 10am to deal with teams in Europe and then go to the office from 11am - 6pm. And wardrobe is irrelevant, so I love not having to wear dress clothes...ever. Other benefits such as medical, dental, vision, HSA, etc. are very well supported. Moving around to a new job or working on different products seems to be possible, but some roles have a very limited growth potential and don't have a career path per se. It's up to employees to make their own path, but management seems to be supportive of such moves.

Cons

The company is still quite large and, as a result, still very siloed. Some teams play well with others, but some teams (and especially some individuals) practice safeguarding their processes or knowledge, which is very frustrating. Often, there is lack of coordination between teams and a lack of a shared sense of purpose or achieving results. Most folks will do their work in the same prescribed manner they've been using for the last 20 years and won't lift a finger to do anything more. There is a huge lack of willingness to change in this company. This is magnified by the past few years of going through Chapter 11 bankruptcy and laying off (or giving an incentive package to leave) most of the younger employees. Most of the employees are nearing retirement age and have no incentive to create new processes or solutions. Management refuses to invest in new tools or technology, or mandate change from the top down. As a result, there are long-standing issues with old processes that are extremely outdated, very clunky, and very slow to launch new products or deliver quality results for our customers. Most processes are still waterfall based and agile is a term that's thrown around as though it's an exciting theoretical concept, but it's still never implemented because the old, non-agile processes (and employee mentalities) are so deeply embedded. Most of the company's efforts seem to be around cost-cutting at the moment, which means reducing head count wherever possible. This drives short-term operational margin gains, but does not bode well for future growth. I've heard it's almost impossible for new hires to be approved at the moment, but this is hearsay. The company seems consistently to be trying to catch up to the market rather than actually innovate and lead. We seem always to be at least 5 years behind the technology curve, but our large customer base (who won't upgrade) seems to be just as far behind the times so they remain on track as usual, but our competitors beat us to the market every time. Management (and especially the CEO) have no clear direction for the company, priorities shift constantly without warning, and there is little to no company culture to align with. There have been recent efforts to launch the "New Avaya", which has been just as successful as New Coke in that we got weird new marketing designs (purely cosmetic) without any underlying changes to how we operate as a company. Management has recently shifted dramatically from focusing on SW only products back to focusing on hardware as recent financial pressure (getting out of bankruptcy and going public yet again) has forced them to focus on short-term revenue generators. Unfortunately this means that more relevant solutions such as subscription and usage-based products get the back seat as they are much longer revenue plays that don't contribute to Wall Street projections in the near-term. As a result of all these items, there is often a highly disjointed feel to your work and your efforts with management demanding projects be completed quickly without proper resources or without anyone properly thinking through the offer from end-to-end. This results in rushed products that go out the door with large quality issues and with major functionality outages due to lack of planning and communication between teams to deliver a unified solution. Finally, the financial future of the company remains uncertain. With short-term financial pressure to make certain margins, hiring and investing in tools and people seems to be out of the question. We have repeatedly shifted from private to public and rumors swirl about leveraged buyouts or selling off chunks of the company. Either way, this company does not have the resources to remain competitive and all the financial interests seem likely to continue these trends of either increasing bad debt or continued loss of revenue-producing segments of the company.

Viewing 52 - 54 of 3,579 Reviews

Glassdoor has 4,090 Avaya reviews submitted anonymously by Avaya employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Avaya is right for you.