Ashoka reviews

3.2

48% would recommend to a friend

(251 total reviews)
avatar

Bill Drayton

44% approve of CEO

34% positive business outlook

Ashoka has an employee rating of 3.2 out of 5 stars, based on 251 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Ashoka employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the ONG y Organizaciones sin fines de lucro industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

251 reviews
1.0
Jan 21, 2016

Founder Syndrome -- The Emperor Has No Clothes

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Our fellow colleagues and staff overall is comprised of wonderful, nice, well-intentioned individuals who are good people. They are the kind of people you want to keep in touch with and get to know outside of work. The Ashoka Fellows themselves, for the most part, make a difference and do incredible work. Ashoka's search and selection process for identifying Fellows is the strongest part of the organization. Ashoka U is also a legitimate program.

Cons

The root of all the problems lies with the founder who is still the CEO since 1980. There is significant founder syndrome and nobody has the courage and/or ability to tell him what has been obvious to everyone else for so many years. The other top leadership members are also lacking. They are nice people but are ineffective. Ashoka is run like a family organization with little regard for or investment in basic, fundamental operations such as finance, accounting, marketing and human resources. It exemplifies what is wrong with most NGOs. It needs to be run like a professional organization, which requires real leadership and quality staff (which requires competitive pay). Good intentions and "nice" people do not cut it. Surely, being a nice person and being effective do not have to be mutually exclusive, but Ashoka needs a wake-up call. It suffers from a lethargic, complacent attitude that stems from being satisfied with marginal improvement from the status quo. Basic improvements are celebrated rather than expected. The standards are too low to make any real progress and become a relevant, yet alone a leading, citizen sector organization again.

3.0
Jan 14, 2016

Brilliance and impact, but crazy

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Brilliant colleagues, amazing fellows who are realizing genuine impact, cool projects with high-profile partners, widely recognized brand in the nonprofit world. Lots of opportunities to take on substantive work and high-level responsibilities for those who prove themselves.

Cons

Emphasis on hiring "entrepreneurs" and "changemakers" means staff is heavy on visionaries and high-level thinkers but often short on doers -- the operational people who actually get things done. Flat organizational structure means minimal upward mobility for early-to-mid-career people in their late 20s and early 30s. The organization is crazy even by nonprofit standards. Some days it's a wonder it holds together at all.

2.0
Dec 28, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good connections to corporate and foundation funders. The mission, brand and hiring process are great at drawing-in talented folks. If you find yourself in a good team, then you can do interesting work. Excellent brand within the small world of international development and social impact.

Cons

The salaries are intentionally kept below the normal non-profit market rate, as a way to attract candidates who are likely to put high value on the org's mission, in lieu of salary. The culture of the org is generated by folks who can tolerate low pay. They fall into two main groups (a) young, idealistic, self-confident, high-performers who are attracted to the story and network around Ashoka and tend to burn out within 1-2 years (b) independently wealthy and/or semi-retired folks who are attracted to the mission of the org. Both groups tend to be drawn from elite backgrounds from the USA or other countries--not a lot of diversity in that regard. There are as many senior staff as mid-career staff. And, both of those groups are dwarfed by a very large number of early-career staff. The org isn't structured to provide its super-committed, entrepreneurial staff with opportunities to actually be entrepreneurial inside the org. The leadership of the org has learned that early-career staff burn out in 1-2 years, and they organize around that expectation. It is extremely rare for people in mid-career roles to elevate into senior roles. Instead, they constantly aim to hire people from outside for senior roles, so that they can benefit from the networks that the new outside senior people can bring to Ashoka's network. As other reviewers have noted, the CEO is micromanaging. The CEO is the founder and permanent member of the org's board. The other board members are old friends of the CEO. Also, the management team that the CEO has drawn around himself is an echo chamber. When talking publicly, the CEO espouses values of distributed fluid leadership and teamwork, and often supports that by pointing to the fact that there is no written org chart for Ashoka. However, the lack of an org chart serves the purpose of obscuring the actual personality-based, clique-based structure of authority that exists in practice, in the organization. This kind of thing is present in all organizations to some extent, but in Ashoka it's the main organizing principle. This produces very little transparency, accountability, or learning throughout the org.

Viewing 199 - 201 of 251 Reviews

Glassdoor has 433 Ashoka reviews submitted anonymously by Ashoka employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Ashoka is right for you.