World Bank Group reviews

4.1

83% would recommend to a friend

(2,935 total reviews)

Ajay Banga

84% approve of CEO

74% positive business outlook

World Bank Group has an employee rating of 4.1 out of 5 stars, based on 2,935 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an excellent working experience there. The World Bank Group employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Finanzas industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

3K reviews
5.0
Nov 2, 2014

An opportunity to have a real impact

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Diverse employment pool of passionate, top-notch colleagues; Excellent compensation and benefits, even if these are quite rightly being scaled down; Operations staff are generally given a high degree of autonomy and responsibility to design and implement projects.

Cons

Morale is at a low level with a lot of concerns over much-needed downsizing; Quality of management is inconsistent; Very personality driven as an organization; Value proposition for short term consultants is far less compelling.

3.0
Nov 1, 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Excellent renumeration packages for staff & ETC/ETTs. Working with country clients is challenging and exciting. Colleagues are intelligent and every day is a great learning experience. The work itself can be extremely engaging and challenging. Work life balance can be good if the travel schedule isn't too onerous.

Cons

1. Unbearable organizational hypocrisy and highly unequal work place, while touting shared prosperity. STCs have been sidelined in the reform process, although its a major HR problem. STCs, particularly those with G4 visas can only work for the Bank if based in the US, but are excluded from mailing lists, have no benefits, sometimes have problems getting decent rates approved, and often end up working for free given the 150 day limit per FY. Management seems unconcerned about addressing this or even integrating those STCs who spend their full time supporting the goals of the Bank and its clients to the process. Young people have a hard time breaking in. The young professional program is seen as the only way in, but excludes young people who have passed the age limit for entry. Furthermore, the Bank is very top heavy and this hasn't seemed to change with the reform process. 2. The Bank seems to be becoming more centralized, with decision making being centralized with Global Practice Directors (some of whom are really out of touch with regional nuances and have limited understanding of client engagement) and senior management. This is highly inefficient. 3. Too inward focused: Many staff believe the Bank is the end-all and be-all of existence. This is particularly true of senior staff who have worked at the Bank for most of their lives. There is little engagement with other agencies on the ground on some projects. Some senior management staff are really out of touch with country contexts, but are responsible for determining work programs and budget allocation. Much could be learnt from what other development partners are doing, and while there has been some improvement recently, more could be done beyond a brown bag lunch here and there. 4. Working on internal bureaucratic procedures can be time and energy consuming. Persons working on projects end up spending most of their time on Bank processes. It gets quite boring and frustrating when the bulk of your work involves Bank bureaucracy. 5. Some of the people I work with at the Bank are the brightest and best in their respective fields. However, having worked at several organizations, I can safely say that the level of gossip and trash talking other colleagues I've experienced here surpasses anywhere else I have worked. You really need to be careful with what you say to colleagues.

4.0
Oct 30, 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Definitely in operations, it's a fast-paced environment. At this level, there is opportunity to work on a range of things- managing staff, leading complex or high-profile initiatives (country and/or regional), representing your global practice on corporate WGs or the like. Despite the current environment, there are still so many incredibly talented people from pretty much every corner of the planet. No single day is routine.

Cons

Senior Management, including some leadership in the Global Practices are incredibly tone-deaf and imposing new processes or measures that boggle the mind and frustrate staff. The benefits package seems to constantly be under scrutiny - granted it's generous by US standards but it is not maintaining its competitiveness with Tier-1 consulting firms or investment banks.

Viewing 2692 - 2694 of 2,935 Reviews

Glassdoor has 5,054 World Bank Group reviews submitted anonymously by World Bank Group employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if World Bank Group is right for you.