QA reviews

3.3

52% would recommend to a friend

(951 total reviews)
avatar

Josh Hubbert

57% approve of CEO

39% positive business outlook

QA has an employee rating of 3.3 out of 5 stars, based on 951 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The QA employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Educación industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

951 reviews
1.0
Apr 3, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

· Work/life balance has been good during some periods of my tenure. · The company is supportive if you need to take unexpected leave. · There are some conscientious, intelligent people in pockets of the business. · The company has some fantastic clients from a variety of industries.

Cons

· Management - The company has a middle-management heavy structure, with many managers lacking the necessary skills to drive results. Over the last 2 years, this has contributed to a noticeable decline in overall company performance. During my time at the company, I observed poor leadership, with instances of gaslighting and managerial involvement that negatively impacted client retention. Managers regularly called me directly on Teams to ask me for updates on clients that I didn’t manage and hadn’t managed previously. Often, I had already communicated that this client was not within my remit and that I couldn’t help them. Additionally, there was a lack of clarity regarding roles and responsibilities and feedback provided was often disconnected from factual performance metrics. · Remuneration - The compensation package is significantly below industry standards for comparable roles, compounded by an 18-month pay freeze (still ongoing). As a result, real wages have not covered inflation during the cost of living crisis. Despite a bonus being promised in my contract, there was no clear commission structure for nearly a year. When a new structure was introduced and committed to, leadership adjusted the terms under which commission would be awarded at very short notice. These changes were communicated inadequately, and when I questioned the lack of notice, I was offered a small, one-off payment under the condition that it remain confidential. · Progression – Despite over two and a half years at the company, there were no opportunities for career advancement. Initially, I managed a small team, but following a restructure, I was left with no choice but to adopt an individual contributor role. This also meant taking on additional clients without prior notice or support. To boot, the company fired one of my direct reports without notifying me. · Lack of training and upskilling - Although the company positions itself as a training provider, the only valuable skill I gained was managing upwards. There was a real lack of substantial training and development opportunities. · Workload – Due to an unclear team structure and insufficient support, I found myself performing two full-time roles for almost six months. Despite raising this issue with my manager, I was told my workload was ‘the curse of the capable’ and that there was no immediate plan to address the staffing gap. · Resources – The company’s attempts to consolidate three legacy instances of Salesforce into one group instance were poorly executed. Stakeholders were not adequately consulted and the resulting CRM system we had access to was ineffective. Many customer records were deleted or accidentally duplicated during the process which made the platform a labyrinth of incomprehensible data. This led to the use of outdated Excel spreadsheets for business forecasting, which likely contributed to the company’s overall performance challenges. Additionally, the lack of basic client-facing resources, such as sales decks or platform walkthroughs/FAQs, led to ongoing customer frustration, with the company’s solution to point clients to our website rather than provide the required materials.

1.0
Dec 6, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I Can’t think of any

Cons

Bad staff management Favouritism Have too many changes Not flexible working (one rule for one, one rule for another) Not a friendly environment in the office

avatar
QA Response
1y
We’re equally grateful for your candid observations about the challenges you experienced. We take all feedback seriously, and your comments are being shared with the relevant teams, including senior leadership. While it’s difficult to hear that you found aspects of your time with us frustrating, it’s important to us that we understand these concerns so we can address them constructively. We know there is always room to do better, and we are committed to listening and improving. Steps are already underway to re-evaluate our internal processes and strengthen communication between leadership and teams. If you would like to discuss any of these aspects further, please do reach out to the People Team.
4.0
Jul 29, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good people to work with

Cons

need to pay better - £10-15k under market rate

avatar
QA Response
1y
Thank you for sharing your feedback! We’re pleased to hear you appreciate the QA culture and environment. Fostering a supportive culture is a priority and we ensure throughout our hiring processes and internal initiatives, that employees are aligned to the QA values and mission, ensuring cultural alignment. We acknowledge your concern about salaries and regularly evaluate our compensation to ensure it remains competitive and equitable. Additionally, we focus on offering a range of attractive benefits, training, and career development to enhance the QA employee experience. If you want to hear more about your benefits and additional package elements, please reach out to the People Team.
Viewing 202 - 204 of 951 Reviews

Glassdoor has 1,047 QA reviews submitted anonymously by QA employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if QA is right for you.