Pall reviews

3.2

56% would recommend to a friend

(916 total reviews)

Naresh Narasimhan

41% approve of CEO

36% positive business outlook

Pall has an employee rating of 3.2 out of 5 stars, based on 916 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Pall employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Manufactura industry (3.5 stars).

Reviews by job title

916 reviews
1.0
Apr 22, 2016

No innovation allowed here!

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Immediate team was great, and I did enjoy the work I was doing. Pay was ok. Benefits were slightly above average.

Cons

Top leadership only cared about next quarter's profits and stock price. Therefore, they didn't invest in new technologies or R&D, and were continually cutting costs (even if made our jobs more difficult). Because of the constant threat of layoffs, everyone kept to themselves and was reluctant to share any information with other teams for fear of making themselves expendable. Senior managers were all about titles and appearances, but nobody wanted to make bold decisions for fear it would cost them their job. It was one of those companies where leadership thinks things are going great, blissfully unaware that most employees were deeply dissatisfied because they never actually talked to anyone below them. Pretty much everyone who had been there 20+ years agreed that the company had changed drastically for the worse. Since I left, Pall has been bought by Danaher, so I don't know how that has affected the culture. I do know that the former CEO (who was there less than 4 years) got a $109 million golden parachute for slashing costs and enabling the sale to Danaher....just another example of how this company does business.

1.0
Apr 16, 2016

Advice for the new Company (post Danaher)

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good benefits and pay Great people at the plant level. All the mechanisms are in place to be an ethical company - hotline, ethics officer, etc., but (see below).

Cons

The Corporate culture is toxic. Ethics office is reactive rather than proactive. Focuses on individual complaints rather than systemic issues. Blame culture that creates fear and intimidation. Creates a foxhole mentality where people keep their ends low and away from the line of fire. Highly political and ruthless management beyond the plant level. Top leaders are arrogant, self serving and completely unsupportive . Local management held very accountable without authority. They are often the fall guys. Unethical hiring practices in that Pall allow leadership to hire people without disclosing the full nature of the endeavor they are signing up for. Significant business changes that significantly affect the scope of the position are not disclosed until after hire on the first few days on the job. Corporate and regional oversight stifles creativity and diversity of thought. Reviews of rests are plentiful. Expectations are often vague and results are second guessed after the fact. Strategic direction does not filters down, leaving people at the plant level to assume there is no strategic plan.

4.0
Apr 16, 2016

Good experience

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

organised, good colleagues, good experience , good pay

Cons

as an intern i dont see any cons.

Viewing 715 - 717 of 916 Reviews

Glassdoor has 1,074 Pall reviews submitted anonymously by Pall employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Pall is right for you.