Pall reviews

3.3

58% would recommend to a friend

(912 total reviews)

Naresh Narasimhan

43% approve of CEO

37% positive business outlook

Pall has an employee rating of 3.3 out of 5 stars, based on 912 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Pall employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Manufactura industry (3.5 stars).

Reviews by job title

912 reviews
2.0
Aug 31, 2016

Current Employee

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The health insurance as it's provided on day "one" of employment and doesn't require a 3 month probationary period. There are also a lot of tools and electronic resources provided that help finding other coworkers fairly quick and easy.

Cons

There have been a lot of issues at Pall since the Danaher merger which went official around 10/2016. There have been a significant amount of layoffs with 1) compliance; 2) tax; 3) legal; 4) HR being hit; a lot of research positions were hit; half of the Port Washington office is vacant with more people leaving every week. CEO is upset that employees are leaving with a churn over 10% but Danaher doesn't want to give good raises or job security to retain key employees while most jobs are outsourced. Also, main Port Washington facility is for sale with target of Q4 2016. Managers are overcompensated and are keen on writing up employees.

4.0
Jul 8, 2016

Constant Change

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Purchased recently by Danaher Corporation. Danaher is investing a huge amount in the education of the employees and spending a lot of time trying to improve the business processes.

Cons

Fairly regular "reorganizations" and high voluntary turnover rate. This creates a lack of loyalty in the company.

1.0
Apr 16, 2016

Advice for the new Company (post Danaher)

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good benefits and pay Great people at the plant level. All the mechanisms are in place to be an ethical company - hotline, ethics officer, etc., but (see below).

Cons

The Corporate culture is toxic. Ethics office is reactive rather than proactive. Focuses on individual complaints rather than systemic issues. Blame culture that creates fear and intimidation. Creates a foxhole mentality where people keep their ends low and away from the line of fire. Highly political and ruthless management beyond the plant level. Top leaders are arrogant, self serving and completely unsupportive . Local management held very accountable without authority. They are often the fall guys. Unethical hiring practices in that Pall allow leadership to hire people without disclosing the full nature of the endeavor they are signing up for. Significant business changes that significantly affect the scope of the position are not disclosed until after hire on the first few days on the job. Corporate and regional oversight stifles creativity and diversity of thought. Reviews of rests are plentiful. Expectations are often vague and results are second guessed after the fact. Strategic direction does not filters down, leaving people at the plant level to assume there is no strategic plan.

Viewing 61 - 63 of 912 Reviews

Glassdoor has 1,070 Pall reviews submitted anonymously by Pall employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Pall is right for you.