Maru Group reviews

2.7

32% would recommend to a friend

(130 total reviews)

Ged Parton

30% approve of CEO

21% positive business outlook

Maru Group has an employee rating of 2.7 out of 5 stars, based on 130 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The Maru Group employee rating is 27% below average for employers within the Administración y consultoría industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

130 reviews
1.0
Sep 30, 2022

A case study in how not to run a company

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

They have snacks in the kitchen.

Cons

I'm only commenting on the time that I've been working for Maru. I worked for the company for a few years prior to the acquisition but all feedback is based on the current organisation. Cons There are quite a few things to list, so in no particular order. Leadership - I think lack of leadership is probably a better way to describe this. Since the acquisition of edr, the whole company has been flipped on its head. Every good thing that was done, was, effectively undone. Every 18 months there's a different strapline to try to get your head around. "Painting better pictures faster" was a recent one. Unfortunately, the toolkit that everyone is expected to use (including clients) is pretty much MS Paint, so don't expect any masterpieces here. The vision isn't something that I've ever had anyone in senior leadership actually describe in a way that made any sense. Which leads me to think that no-one knows or understands what the strategy is. Working environment - Where researchers go to die. The office is like a graveyard, complete with early 2000's carpet and décor. - Painfully under-staffed in key parts of the business. Knowledgeable people have left and not been replaced and programmes break down constantly (see technology point below) and nobody in the business knows how to fix problems. This is made all the worse when a client phones you and says it's been broken for weeks and nobody at Maru noticed. - HR. There's no real HR function in the UK and as a result, blanket decisions and initiatives get fed down centrally. The company introduces things in a really odd way, as if they'd just been thought of and then sent without looking at the details and the ramifications for people. For example, you can get every other Friday afternoon off, just check with your manager. That's all well and good, but what if you are part time? Or what if you don't work Fridays? On the surface, a great idea, but when you dig into it, you realise they haven't thought it through properly, so the company then spends weeks trying to bottom out something that shouldn't have been released half-baked. I really wouldn't be surprised if a magic 8 ball is responsible for some of the initiatives that get approved. There's definitely a box-ticking exercise going on when it comes to things like health and wellbeing. "Feeling stressed and overworked, then join this online seminar at 5pm PST". Sure, I can stay up until 1am, given I'm probably going to still be working at that time. -Weekly email from the CEO. This is an absolute masterclass in passive aggression. There's always an undercurrent of "Why aren't you better? Look at this person, they're better than you. Why can't you make me more money? I had the whole NY team in the office for a meeting, WHY AREN'T YOU IN YOUR OFFICE TOO?" Technology - This was a real 'ahead of the curve' organisation, had a really great reputation and clients that wanted to work with them. I've seen so many clients (and extremely high-calibre colleagues) walk out the door due to the lack of evolution in the platform and tools. I've heard countless reports of prospects being visibly shocked when parts of the system were being demonstrated during pitches. The focus shifted onto the new shiny stuff and the old was just left to deteriorate. - Not enough variety of snacks in the kitchen

2.0
Jan 13, 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Work with talented researchers; many passionate and intelligent people. Before everything went remote, there was also a fun office culture.

Cons

Company management is very disorganized, there's virtually no investment in professional growth, very low salaries, and general apathy from corporate management towards the people doing the most work to keep the business going.

2.0
Oct 2, 2020

“Meh”

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The people who do the day to day work are amazing and there’s a number of well-meaning people. There’s also an ability to work on different clients if you want to take on more work. There’s also some transparency with the CEO, but not enough to really say what’s actually going on all of the time. Benefits are pretty good, but not enough to stay at the company.

Cons

There’s no real cohesion with the company and it’s like there’s a separation between people who actually do work and those who just have a fancy job title. There shouldn’t be nine “Vice Presidents” of Business Development and six “entry level” research associates. That makes zero sense. There’s too much going on with developing “new” technology, which aren’t new to anyone but complicate things for those who actually work.

Viewing 19 - 21 of 130 Reviews

Glassdoor has 141 Maru Group reviews submitted anonymously by Maru Group employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Maru Group is right for you.