employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

General Atomics

Is this your company?

General Atomics reviews

3.9

71% would recommend to a friend

(1,973 total reviews)
avatar

Neal Blue

78% approve of CEO

68% positive business outlook

General Atomics has an employee rating of 3.9 out of 5 stars, based on 1,973 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The General Atomics employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Aeroespacial y defensa industry (3.6 stars).

Reviews by job title

2K reviews
1.0
Apr 29, 2022

Avoid!!!

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Pension... That's about it. Nothing here is good for the long term.

Cons

Micromanaging, upper management holds these monthly meetings to answer questions and try their best at avoiding sensitive topics like work from home, competitive pay. Employee retention is horrible. they would rather hire new employees than pay current employees competitive pay to meet industry average. they keep saying they are looking into fair pay for years. Lately they screwed all employees on bonuses and raises while the company made huge profit and met goals. Micromanaging, work weekends and unpaid overtime. If you aren't part of the old boys club then you are wasting your time there. Upper management is great at stalling in making changes. Just a bunch of lies. GA pays about 10-15 percent less than most DoD companies in San Diego. latest bonuses were between 1-2 percent, not even close to the 7 percent inflation. Avoid!!! Stay away and work somewhere else where they care about taking care of their engineers. go to Northrup, ratheon, L3, Anduril. Way more pay there and better life-work balance and culture. My years at Northrup were way better than GA. Switching back soon.

2.0
Mar 31, 2022

Good at first, but then not

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The people doing actual work in the group I joined were great; still have friends that work there. The fully paid relocation was a huge benefit. The health benefits were fairly decent. There was decent work/life balance.

Cons

The culture and the management are "old school." The majority of leaders and upper management have been there for 15-20 years and it shows. They are still playing that game of "don't let 'em see you sweat", but the people that do the work know exactly what is going right and what is going wrong. Employees rather have management be forthright and honest about failures and what needs to change. There is no want to change, no want for fresh ideas, no want for leaders that came from other large companies and may have ideas on how to improve. When pointing out that GA is not following aerospace industry accepted standards (and sometimes not following their own standards), it is just silence or lip service. No want to hear an opinion other than their own. It's the GA way, or no way. The preference is to promote people that will fall in line, say "yes", and do it the GA way. Advancement happens due to tenure and not necessarily credentials, although there are some good, competent leaders, but they are often overwhelmed. The employees that do care are stifled and not given opportunities to grow or take on responsibilities. The pay was ok, but still below market value for aerospace engineering. The company wants to claim to compete with big DoD contractors like NG, Lockheed, and Boeing, but they are not and will not be able to. They still think and operate like a small company where decisions have to be made by only a few people rather than delegating authority. GA lacks the organization, infrastructure, and standards that those large companies have. GA is happy to rest on their laurels because their current products continue to be bought and paid for by the government, and now by foreign governments. The newness and the challenge of it wears off quickly, and then it is just rinse and repeat. They like to think they are one of the best places to work, but they are a dead end for career growth. The dead end is made readily apparent by young and/or promising talent leaves after a few years or so. People realize quickly that management is out of touch, does not treat the employees like they matter or like their work matters. The best analogy was as a "country club." You can go there, maybe do a little work that is somewhat engineering-like, get paid, and go home. If you have a family and want a semi-stable place, then it is a decent option.

3.0
Jan 26, 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Off Fridays Work Life Balance Great Co-workers Busy environment Opportunities within the company Learning opportunities

Cons

*Raises are getting worst by the year 2% average (used to be 3.0%) *Company does not want to go Hybrid *Management does not want to pay employees who are currently at GA more but rather pay more for newly hired employees *Do not enforce Covid-19 regulations

Viewing 58 - 60 of 1,973 Reviews

Glassdoor has 2,264 General Atomics reviews submitted anonymously by General Atomics employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if General Atomics is right for you.