Good Company to work for - Anonymous employee PayPal Employee Review

4.0
Jul 24, 2016
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good Benefits and Perks. Also work is challenging , Good compensation as well

Cons

Extremely political managers and co workers, promotions depend on how much you talk rather than actual work

avatar
PayPal Response
9y
Thanks for taking the time to comment on your PayPal experience; we pride ourselves on having a culture that is inclusive and appreciate your feedback. As a global company of more than 18,000 employees, our ability to work across boundaries and leverage our network of networks enables us to fully harness our collective shared horsepower. So what might seem like, “just talk” might also be our building and maintaining the very relationships that enable us to provide the best service to our customers. Thanks again for your comments and thanks for keeping up the good work and remaining committed to PayPal’s success.

Explore other reviews about PayPal

5.0
May 15, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good company to work for, good work life balance

Cons

They should have more developers than other titles.

2.0
Apr 13, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

PayPal has a lot of potential. It has two very strong brands in PayPal and Venmo with significant awareness and user bases that other companies envy. There are pockets of teams that are really pushing the envelop to reimagine what PayPal and Venmo could be—especially the Venmo team—and to move with speed given the company must stay focused and not waste time with Apple Pay, Shop Pay, and so many other competitors nipping at PayPal's heels and aggressively taking market share.

Cons

While some teams are pushing to self-disrupt and are moving fast, too many teams—and I'd argue the majority of the company–are living off of PayPal's laurels from the late 2010s through the pandemic. The culture and mindset have to change for the company to remain competitive. Otherwise, they are the Titanic and they're sinking slowly. The former CEO who only last 2 years tried diversifying the company's revenue, planning for the future. But the board and its former chairman (now new CEO) felt he wasn't moving fast enough to stabilize and marketshare. Instead, the board hired the former chairman who made computers and printers at HP—another sinking ship—to lead the oldest fintech company. The loss of confidence in the leadership team and the strategy are only accelerating.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All