Pretty good, would recommend, just wasn't for me - Anonymous employee NASCAR Employee Review

3.0
Oct 4, 2021
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Most people in senior leadership roles are really good people. Most of the people I worked alongside of were also really good people. Being able to travel to a handful of events throughout the year was nice as well. Diversity and inclusion is a serious area of focus and I appreciated that.

Cons

Since the merger of ISC and NASCAR, and the subsequent restructure, there isn't a great deal of vertical mobility, especially for those still at the track level, or "regions" as they call it now. I don't think the business model is really good for people with families, or trying to grow a family. The season goes from February to November with events every weekend during that time, so you're always on and there is very little down time. That's the fault of no one, though. Just the model of the sport. There are a couple longtime employees at VP level positions that have created toxic work environments. Leadership and HR are aware of them, but they remain in their roles.

Explore other reviews about NASCAR

5.0
Oct 23, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great start job i guess

Cons

lack of structure withing different departments

2.0
May 4, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The role offered engaging work in the NASCAR environment, which was exciting and meaningful for those passionate about motorsports. Strong direct leadership and support during the initial period of employment. Collaborative team environment with interesting projects tied to the racing industry.

Cons

Limited job security. The company underwent multiple rounds of significant layoffs within my first year. I was laid off in the third round after being repeatedly assured during company-wide meetings that remaining employees were safe. Upper management appeared disconnected from day-to-day operations. There was a clear preference for external vendors over internal staff, even in situations where vendors required frequent correction on deliverables and client communications. Following a change in direct management, our team was deprioritized in favor of the third-party vendor, ultimately contributing to our group’s layoff. Compensation was below market rate for the responsibilities and experience required, particularly when compared to the company’s emphasis on executive travel and perks. The work environment felt increasingly corporate, with heavy focus on cost reduction and a reactive approach to performance management.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All