employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Marriott Vacations Worldwide

Engaged Employer

It was flexible and amazing until it wasn’t - Financial Services Manager Marriott Vacations Worldwide Employee Review

2.0
Sep 28, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Salary is great and associates are wonderful.

Cons

I worked from home 3 days a week and in office 2 days ever since COVID. Our FS dept teams lost over half of their virtual employees and the best manager they had for years. All because we went from working from home 3 days a week to not being able to work at home at all not even if we are sick. We lost so many people and a good manager who our team actually liked and engaged them all because the director of our office doesn’t want to budge and be flexible. It was really unfair. Lakeland does not follow the same rules as Orlando. Orlando HR came out with rules on hybrid and working from home but Lakeland did not budge and refused to be even flexible for virtual roles highly exceeding their performances each year. This shows that they don’t care about the current employees like they say they do. Maybe corporate but not Lakeland

avatar
Marriott Vacations Worldwide Response
2y
Thank you for your candid feedback. We are concerned to hear about the issues you have identified. We appreciate your constructive comments and strongly encourage you to share any additional details about your associate experience by emailing AssociateServiceCenter@MVWC.com.

Explore other reviews about Marriott Vacations Worldwide

5.0
May 3, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

All of it growth potential and the ability to provide for my family based on what I do for the company

Cons

Pressure is a privilege. !

2.0
May 22, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Bebefits like medical were good.

Cons

During my employment as a Quality Assurance employee, I experienced clear unequal treatment compared to colleagues in the same position. Westbound QA employees were not required to clock in and out for lunch, while Eastbound QA employees like myself were required to do so — despite holding identical job classifications. As an hourly employee, this meant I was regularly working unpaid time during mandatory "break" periods. This was not a minor oversight — it was a policy applied unequally between teams. When I raised this concern directly to my manager, instead of acknowledging the legitimate issue, my manager responded by threatening to file an internal HR complaint against me — claiming I had raised my voice in a customer area. I did not raise my voice. Rather than addressing the problem, my manager used this as an opportunity to discourage me from speaking up further. This entire conversation was recorded with my manager's full knowledge and consent. Additionally, a senior manager in my department consistently declined notarization requests from the sales team, redirecting all notary work to me despite being equally qualified. When I was finally given authorization by the Director to take my 30-minute break, I returned to find 7 notarization documents piled on my desk — the senior manager had declined to handle them during my authorized absence.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All