Zero Training. Learn as you go on your own - Site Marken Employee Review

1.0
Oct 25, 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Remote work Rewarding work to be in clinical trials providing and improving access to patients who need these trials. Colleagues and myself worked very hard and went above and beyond to bring home health care visits to fruition. Often times we worked on weekends with no appreciation.

Cons

-no training on the job. I was just expected to know things and figure them out. -outsourced nurses and health care provider which means there were times patient safety and data integrity were compromised. This happened with almost every single remote visit. Some of the contracted providers were fantastic but some didn't really care which lead to missing data, and jeopardized patient safety in the trials. Marken contracted with any provider who would accept their low rates. -Lots of inconsistencies in the quality of the home health care visits -Inability to keep up with promises made to clients Uses outdated means of capturing data. This makes the processes very manual and leads to a lot of unnecessary errors -Have better ways of protecting PHI. I was often shared PHI for no reason. -This company will find any reason to fire an employee and won't even explain what they did wrong -If an employee gets seriously sick and falls a day behind, there is immediately talks of letting them go. This happened numerous times on my team -If an employee's child falls ill and they are unable to get childcare on short notice, this company will fire them. -They are very behind on their goals -Leadership picks favorites and race is often used as a determining factor.

Explore other reviews about Marken

1.0
Apr 24, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

There are no pros if I did not get hired

Cons

Pay advertised was not accurate * Lack of transparency in compensation * Wasted time and travel expenses I had a very frustrating experience with the hiring process. I attended the interview and was told my performance was “perfect,” which made it seem like I was a strong candidate. However, the role was advertised at a minimum of $30/hour, and later I was told the actual pay was closer to $20/hour. That’s a major discrepancy and feels very misleading. On top of that, I ultimately received a rejection despite the positive feedback. Between the misleading pay and the outcome, this process felt inconsistent and unprofessional. I also spent time and money on travel (gas) to attend the interview, which makes the experience even more frustrating. Overall, this felt like a waste of time and could have been avoided with clearer and more honest communication upfront.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All