Mixed bag - Project Manager Leidos Employee Review

2.0
Sep 18, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Benefits, work-life balance, remote opportunities

Cons

exclusive promotion/hiring practices. it's not what you know, or what you do, that matters, it's who you know. You will not be promoted based on merit. Experienced a Director proclaim on an open conference line that she does not like working with men and will not promote them. Then she hired female only managers for the organization. There was no repercussion for this obvious violation of Equal opportunity law. Interviews are often for show, and it's not a very well kept secret that decisions are made before jobs are posted. If you are getting the exact job you want and have no intention of career advancement Leidos may be a fine company for you. If you are looking for a career to grow and advance, save yourself the frustration and avoid working here.

Explore other reviews about Leidos

5.0
Jun 2, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Incredibly welcoming and tight knit community. Everyone works as a team and there is a sense of togetherness. Known schedule for the year including vacation and off days. Rewarding work.

Cons

Flight Service is a 24/7 operation and like all aviation careers, your schedule is based on seniority. The longer you’re with the company the better your schedule becomes but this likely means late or overnight shifts and working holidays.

3.0
May 27, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Leidos provides opportunities to work on complex government programs with meaningful technical challenges. Depending on the contract and team, there can be exposure to cloud infrastructure, cybersecurity, systems engineering, networking, and mission-focused work that is difficult to find elsewhere. The company also has a large footprint, so there may be internal opportunities for people who are able to navigate the organization.

Cons

My experience was that the quality of management varied significantly by program. Communication around expectations, roles, and priorities was often inconsistent, and decisions that affected employees were not always explained clearly or handled in a transparent way. Work-life balance also depended heavily on local management. Flexibility that existed in practice could be changed quickly, and employees were sometimes left trying to reconcile changing expectations with existing workloads and personal obligations. In my view, the company would benefit from stronger oversight of program-level management decisions, especially where employee responsibilities, workplace flexibility, and performance feedback are concerned. I also found that technical decision-making was sometimes driven more by schedule pressure than by sound engineering judgment. On complex government programs, that can create unnecessary risk and frustration for employees who are trying to do things correctly.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All