Promises to get you in the door, than backs out on everything - Anonymous employee Leidos Employee Review

1.0
Dec 18, 2020
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Remote work for some projects

Cons

The covid response is ridiculous. When covid first hit, Leidos had a stance of "it won't happen to us" they forced people to burn through all of their PTO for covid, then got rid of people once they hit a balance of 0, they got rid of them. The CEO makes weekly videos of how to "stay safe in a world of covid" from his mansion saying "life is hard" My team was shutdown due to Covid and I got shuffled into a random gov contract that isn't relevant to my experience. Management schedules meetings, and than doesn't show up to them. I have no idea how this company stays in business. Nothing is logical. They promote people into jobs they are vastly not qualified to do, than provide no training for these management folks. The security practices are "everything is bad, lets block everything" instead of educating your staff. You can't do local development because you can't even install software IDEs to code in. I haven't heard from MY management in over 12 months, they don't respond to phone calls, emails, Skype messages...

Explore other reviews about Leidos

5.0
May 7, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Large companies. Willingness to work with you.

Cons

Low paying. No hybrid opportunity

3.0
May 27, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Leidos provides opportunities to work on complex government programs with meaningful technical challenges. Depending on the contract and team, there can be exposure to cloud infrastructure, cybersecurity, systems engineering, networking, and mission-focused work that is difficult to find elsewhere. The company also has a large footprint, so there may be internal opportunities for people who are able to navigate the organization.

Cons

My experience was that the quality of management varied significantly by program. Communication around expectations, roles, and priorities was often inconsistent, and decisions that affected employees were not always explained clearly or handled in a transparent way. Work-life balance also depended heavily on local management. Flexibility that existed in practice could be changed quickly, and employees were sometimes left trying to reconcile changing expectations with existing workloads and personal obligations. In my view, the company would benefit from stronger oversight of program-level management decisions, especially where employee responsibilities, workplace flexibility, and performance feedback are concerned. I also found that technical decision-making was sometimes driven more by schedule pressure than by sound engineering judgment. On complex government programs, that can create unnecessary risk and frustration for employees who are trying to do things correctly.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All