Not a people company - Senior IT Management Consultant/Senior Project Manager Leidos Employee Review

1.0
Oct 20, 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

You get to see lots of new faces every day

Cons

Extremely poor communication from management to staff. In most cases this was due to senior management not communicating with middle management. Leidos makes no effort to understand its people and their capabilities as an organisation. It operates as a collection of miniempires with management changing regularly. Treats staff as commodities to be hired and fired as required. It wasn't unusual for staff to be told they'd be redeployed to another part of the country for 2 years, without any consultation. A person's value is measured by their role rather than their achievements or ability. PDP is used as a tool to measure whether an individual continues to fit the role rather than furthering that person's development. Top down hierarchy. Everything comes down from above, nothing ever goes up. Tries to apply US employment practices in the UK. Seems to be completely ignorant of EU employment laws.

Explore other reviews about Leidos

5.0
May 7, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Large companies. Willingness to work with you.

Cons

Low paying. No hybrid opportunity

3.0
May 27, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Leidos provides opportunities to work on complex government programs with meaningful technical challenges. Depending on the contract and team, there can be exposure to cloud infrastructure, cybersecurity, systems engineering, networking, and mission-focused work that is difficult to find elsewhere. The company also has a large footprint, so there may be internal opportunities for people who are able to navigate the organization.

Cons

My experience was that the quality of management varied significantly by program. Communication around expectations, roles, and priorities was often inconsistent, and decisions that affected employees were not always explained clearly or handled in a transparent way. Work-life balance also depended heavily on local management. Flexibility that existed in practice could be changed quickly, and employees were sometimes left trying to reconcile changing expectations with existing workloads and personal obligations. In my view, the company would benefit from stronger oversight of program-level management decisions, especially where employee responsibilities, workplace flexibility, and performance feedback are concerned. I also found that technical decision-making was sometimes driven more by schedule pressure than by sound engineering judgment. On complex government programs, that can create unnecessary risk and frustration for employees who are trying to do things correctly.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All