Company / Job Review - Subcontract Administrator Leidos Employee Review

4.0
Jul 31, 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Great Leadership - Team comradeship, team members will go out of there way to provide guidance if needed - Great internal resources, Leidos provides a solid repository for employees to research and resolve questions. If you have an issue, conduct due dillegence, and present your findings before approaching leadership. It will go a long way! - Company perks, Leidos will offer many perks, outings, BBQs, Community events, so forth. Take advantage of these events! - Benefits, not necessarily the best in the federal contracting world but they are certainly competitive - Work Life Balance, If you show you are can manage your taskings - Leidos will allow you to work on FLEX time and WFH -New Work; since Leidos acquired a segment of LM; Leidos has won various awards to open up new opportunites

Cons

- Salary: Leidos is not as competitive as other federal contractors and negotiation in salary is hard to facilitate. -Promotion: Leidos is hard set on promoting individuals regardless of your accomplishments. It is an antiquated system that only looks at years in service. This may be case by case basis but it has led to a lot of turn over in my years within the organization Turnover: Similar to the above, Leidos has a lot of turnover as young adults/ early career professionals are in need of higher salary to afford the cost of living in there areas. Look at where major Leidos facilities are, most are in major cities & I strognly advise you research your options. Leidos has a hard time being competitive by offering appropriate salaries. They tend to rake in there profits on federal contracts and offset their employee base. If you were to make $75K in salary the contract you support may allow $90K but Leidos will keep the profit. In any case a lot of their employees are indirect so those profits get offset into indirect profit pools. Keep that in mind. - Age: To the young professionals out there, Leidos tends to higher a lot of young people however beware; Most leave because they find better opportunities with better pay. A lot of the workforce despite what you may hear are older professionals with lots of experience. There are pros and cons however be weary. Management: Leidos management is spectacular however, not many things can shift unless you are respected by your peers. Line level management has no issues, senior management should rid their antiquated ways of conducting top-level , bottom-down style of implementing strategy. Keep in mind that senior management don't do a lot of the workforce related tasks. They make it seem that what they are doing has huge impact on the workforce and growing the company but it does not. Leidos only grew exponentially because of the merge with LM. There was a lot of turnover during that period and management did not take to a successful LM business group and their ideas. In any case, Line Level management is great within Leidos. Trust your direct managers. They are your tool and WILL help you grow. They make the company.

Explore other reviews about Leidos

5.0
Jun 2, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Incredibly welcoming and tight knit community. Everyone works as a team and there is a sense of togetherness. Known schedule for the year including vacation and off days. Rewarding work.

Cons

Flight Service is a 24/7 operation and like all aviation careers, your schedule is based on seniority. The longer you’re with the company the better your schedule becomes but this likely means late or overnight shifts and working holidays.

3.0
May 27, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Leidos provides opportunities to work on complex government programs with meaningful technical challenges. Depending on the contract and team, there can be exposure to cloud infrastructure, cybersecurity, systems engineering, networking, and mission-focused work that is difficult to find elsewhere. The company also has a large footprint, so there may be internal opportunities for people who are able to navigate the organization.

Cons

My experience was that the quality of management varied significantly by program. Communication around expectations, roles, and priorities was often inconsistent, and decisions that affected employees were not always explained clearly or handled in a transparent way. Work-life balance also depended heavily on local management. Flexibility that existed in practice could be changed quickly, and employees were sometimes left trying to reconcile changing expectations with existing workloads and personal obligations. In my view, the company would benefit from stronger oversight of program-level management decisions, especially where employee responsibilities, workplace flexibility, and performance feedback are concerned. I also found that technical decision-making was sometimes driven more by schedule pressure than by sound engineering judgment. On complex government programs, that can create unnecessary risk and frustration for employees who are trying to do things correctly.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All