Great work/life balance but limited career growth options. Low effort/low reward. - Power Distribution Designer Leidos Employee Review

3.0
Apr 10, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great work/life balance, and a healthy work environment. Decent amount of PTO, and its generally accepted to take time off whenever you need/want. Flexible work schedule. Management is respectful and generally willing to make accommodations to your needs as long as you're getting the work done that you need to, when you need to. Health insurance and other benefits are fairly decent.

Cons

Stagnation. Role feels like a dead end, and other than moving into supervisory/management positions, the opportunities for career growth just aren't there. Pretty high turnover, and processes & quality metrics are constantly changing one way, then another, then back to how they were etc. The pay isn't good, but it's competitive with other companies in the area.

Explore other reviews about Leidos

5.0
May 21, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great benefits and career pathing

Cons

No cons that I can think of

3.0
May 27, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Leidos provides opportunities to work on complex government programs with meaningful technical challenges. Depending on the contract and team, there can be exposure to cloud infrastructure, cybersecurity, systems engineering, networking, and mission-focused work that is difficult to find elsewhere. The company also has a large footprint, so there may be internal opportunities for people who are able to navigate the organization.

Cons

My experience was that the quality of management varied significantly by program. Communication around expectations, roles, and priorities was often inconsistent, and decisions that affected employees were not always explained clearly or handled in a transparent way. Work-life balance also depended heavily on local management. Flexibility that existed in practice could be changed quickly, and employees were sometimes left trying to reconcile changing expectations with existing workloads and personal obligations. In my view, the company would benefit from stronger oversight of program-level management decisions, especially where employee responsibilities, workplace flexibility, and performance feedback are concerned. I also found that technical decision-making was sometimes driven more by schedule pressure than by sound engineering judgment. On complex government programs, that can create unnecessary risk and frustration for employees who are trying to do things correctly.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All