Managers nest - Software Engineer Ingenico Employee Review

1.0
Jan 23, 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

After working in Ingenico almost everything else will seem like heaven to you! Some nice people work there, office is ok.

Cons

As an engineer you will not be able to do your work normally in Ingenico. Most of your time will be spent dealing with 50 different managers or directors and filling some meaningless documents and forms or being dragged to the meetings. Most important thing is that the numbers look good, doesn’t matter how much of actual value was delivered. To click a simple deploy button you will have to create few separate tasks and documents and gather 4 different approvals. And nobody might even care that button was not actually clicked as chain of responsibility is lost. They hire special agile coaches to tell them how to do “devops” and don’t want to ask developers. There is a fundamental lack of trust from management into their own employees, and every achievement is presented as manager’s. You are not allowed to have your opinion and you are not allowed to be “unhappy”. Technically company is widely outdated although engineers are trying their best under the circumstances such as constant business pressure and vicious priority cycle (they even have 2 lists of different priorities for the same teams). But after some time of resistance and not getting anywhere everyone is just loosing motivation. For an engineer Ingenico is the place to spend last few years before the retirement, otherwise you will find yourself way behind on the technical skills and in difficulty to find a new job after. Also new “career path” system will guarantee that only manager favorites will be promoted.

Explore other reviews about Ingenico

5.0
Oct 24, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Flexible work culture helpful team

Cons

No cons as of now

avatar
Ingenico Response
1y
Thank you for your honest feedback.
3.0
Mar 1, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Supportive team members who are willing to answer questions and provide guidance. The environment offers valuable insight into how large scale payment systems operate, which is beneficial for anyone interested in fintech or enterprise technology.

Cons

The internship-to-full-time pipeline lacks structure and transparency. Interns were told entry level roles would open, but timelines and follow through were unclear, leaving many in extended intern positions without defined conversion pathways. There appears to be an overreliance on long term interns as cost effective operational support rather than investing in structured development and conversion planning. Some interns remain in role well beyond a typical internship cycle, creating uncertainty around long term stability. Communication around hiring forecasts and headcount planning can feel overly optimistic. Expectations may be set publicly, but updates on budget constraints or shifting priorities are not communicated with the same clarity. Career progression for early talent is ambiguous. Without proactive sponsorship and clearly defined benchmarks, interns may struggle to understand what tangible milestones lead to permanent placement.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All