employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

General Atomics

Is this your company?

Learning Environment, Goal Oriented, Patience Required - HR Business Partner General Atomics Employee Review

4.0
Sep 18, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Working with caring and knowledgeable coworkers and partners was the best part. As HR you feel you are able to make a positive impact on your client groups. Most of the HR leaders are very competent, supportive, and help to provide learning opportunities. The company and HR groups have very exciting goals and projects, and consistently look to improve things. Supporting the missions of the company is also rewarding and thrilling to be a part of.

Cons

Like most big companies, there are internal challenges among the HR leaders to get certain decisions made in a timely manner, and bureaucracy that can get frustrating to deal with. Working in HR at this company requires a lot of patience for the internal processes to be executed, especially when executive leaders are adamant in their own approaches to situations and disregard sound HR guidance.

Explore other reviews about General Atomics

5.0
Jun 8, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Very good work life balance

Cons

9 hour shifts 4 days a week

3.0
Jun 11, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Mostly good people and skilled engineers that are easy to work with and great to learn from across all groups/locations. There is opportunity to pursue technical areas of interest and to stand out by leading improvement efforts. The company is flexible and often facilitates changes according to interest. Sense of job security generally feels good and stable, the greater GA really backs the Space division. The greater company works on some really interesting and cool things, beyond just defense. Pay is pretty good. Experience with most middle management (of engineers) has been positive, they typically advocate and support their employees.

Cons

Unsure of division leadership and strategic direction. Overall impression is that engineers' perspectives are not adequately weighted in both proposals and certain decisions for active missions. Processes burden performance, though there is intention for constant improvement. Ignoring engineering concerns (i.e. with schedule) + process burdens often result in delays and increased pressure, and therefore a less than ideal working environment at times. Overtime pay is not guaranteed but can be approved. Working with teams in different locations can lead to tension and "silo-ing" (though not always). Space division is becoming mostly defense focused (an industry trend), but would be nice to continue work in the civil earth and space science arena. They also demo'd a nice cafeteria/gathering space for more work/equipment space.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All