no pay no benifits - Manufacturing Technician Eastman Kodak Employee Review

1.0
Aug 10, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

relaxed because people are leaving for better pay an benifits at many other companies

Cons

low pay compared to other like jobs no matching SIP plan only 56 hours of sick time than your pay goes to fifty percent so if your really sick or out with surgery bankrupcy is the only option only people they find are relatives to hire and they stay for two years andleave for better jobs they invest some of your retirement in thirty year govt bonds this is cheap for them but adds up to nothing for the employee they do have money but only if you apply for jobs outside the company and they match your new jobs starting pay but thats it no pay raises could be for many years this is not the company you want to work for its in a downward spiral stay away

Explore other reviews about Eastman Kodak

5.0
Dec 31, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great people to work with. Enjoyed my time there, left for a better opportunity.

Cons

Building is a little out dated.

2.0
Dec 23, 2025
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

To be fair, there are smart, capable people here, and the Kodak name still opens doors. But culture and execution matter more than branding. Without clarity, trust, and leadership engagement, even good ideas struggle. I don’t regret the experience as it was instructive. But if you’re considering joining, ask very specific questions about role boundaries, feedback cadence, and how decisions actually get made. Don’t confuse constant motion with real progress.

Cons

Working at Kodak was an eye opening experience in how large, legacy organizations try to reinvent themselves while still dragging along all the habits that made reinvention necessary in the first place. It often felt like roles were constantly shifting, ownership was unclear, and people were operating on instinct rather than alignment. There was a lot of activity, plenty of meetings, and very little agreement on who actually owned what. One colleague in particular somehow ended up doing several jobs at once. That may sound impressive, but in practice it created confusion and friction. When one person tries to be everything, it leaves everyone else in an awkward and unnecessary position.Leadership was mostly absent until it wasn’t. There was also a noticeable top down culture. Certain personalities didn’t invite discussion so much as compliance. Offering alternative viewpoints wasn’t encouraged, and collaboration tended to flow in one direction. Confidence often crossed into condescension, which made an already challenging environment harder than it needed to be.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All