I love cake! - Analyst Eastman Kodak Employee Review

4.0
Feb 19, 2009
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

well if your a temp kodak gives you a 6 months vacation with no pay after your 18 month contract is over. some team leaders will take all the credit of what you did but they'll tell that you did a fantastic job and to keep up the good work...in other words in kodak standards if anyone ask you how many people does it take to screw in a light bulb...for kodak it would be about 6 people...about two engineers...1 team leader 1 tech...and then the operator that does all the work... Yes everyone says we should be thankful we have a job, but without the workers there would be no Kodak. This is just a review for our dept not the whole company.

Cons

They get rid of the temps that actually do work and keep the people who do nothing for us. They take away raises and bonuses and then tell us how many billions of dollars they make each quarter, but we do get cake but no ice cream!

Explore other reviews about Eastman Kodak

5.0
Dec 31, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great people to work with. Enjoyed my time there, left for a better opportunity.

Cons

Building is a little out dated.

2.0
Dec 23, 2025
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

To be fair, there are smart, capable people here, and the Kodak name still opens doors. But culture and execution matter more than branding. Without clarity, trust, and leadership engagement, even good ideas struggle. I don’t regret the experience as it was instructive. But if you’re considering joining, ask very specific questions about role boundaries, feedback cadence, and how decisions actually get made. Don’t confuse constant motion with real progress.

Cons

Working at Kodak was an eye opening experience in how large, legacy organizations try to reinvent themselves while still dragging along all the habits that made reinvention necessary in the first place. It often felt like roles were constantly shifting, ownership was unclear, and people were operating on instinct rather than alignment. There was a lot of activity, plenty of meetings, and very little agreement on who actually owned what. One colleague in particular somehow ended up doing several jobs at once. That may sound impressive, but in practice it created confusion and friction. When one person tries to be everything, it leaves everyone else in an awkward and unnecessary position.Leadership was mostly absent until it wasn’t. There was also a noticeable top down culture. Certain personalities didn’t invite discussion so much as compliance. Offering alternative viewpoints wasn’t encouraged, and collaboration tended to flow in one direction. Confidence often crossed into condescension, which made an already challenging environment harder than it needed to be.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All