Idea good, execution lacking - Anonymous employee CGI Employee Review

1.0
Jan 16, 2018
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

ODSC (internal) culture, relaxed and mutually supportive without the hipster/techbro stereotype Enlightened attitude to tech - except for a few more sensitive projects, generally if a new library or approach is alright with the tech lead then that’s all the approval you need. No corporate paperwork for trivial technical changes. Junior people get more opportunity to do higher-level work than in most other places (though that's partly due to the lack of seniors - see 'Cons') Semi-flexible working (has to be a fixed start/end time agreed in writing - but you can change it from the standard 9-5.30) Good pension scheme: maximum 8% employee contribution results in 10.5% employer contribution

Cons

Absolutely no buy-in from the rest of the company for the Agile model or supposed "startup culture" Work-life balance can be poor to non-existent if you get a "bad" project. Consistent under-resourcing of projects means the "bad" ones often outnumber the "good" ones Starting salaries are average, and quickly become uncompetitive given below-inflation annual increases Difficulty in attracting people at senior/leadership level (because of salaries) means there's too much tolerance of mediocrity Career system is a confused mess

Explore other reviews about CGI

5.0
Jun 18, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Work life balance, growth, quality

Cons

Less pay compared to market

1.0
Jun 16, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

no specific positives to highlight from my perspective

Cons

I worked at CGI in both India and the USA and observed similar workplace culture concerns across both locations. The only real difference was HR—India HR felt more supportive, while my experience with USA HR was disappointing. My employment ended shortly after maternity leave due to an alleged “lack of projects,” which I experienced as a layoff. I also observed what appeared to be misuse of position by some leaders, including blurred professional boundaries, preferential treatment, and expectations that went beyond normal workplace roles—at times resembling personal-assistant-style demands rather than professional conduct. Surprisingly, I also noticed inconsistent “policies” applied differently to different individuals. In some cases, it felt like the rules changed depending on who you were. When leadership became aware that someone was related to another employee in the organization, it sometimes felt like that person was singled out or targeted rather than treated objectively. Overall, these practices—whether through inconsistent treatment, perceived power misuse, or favoritism—undermine trust, damage workplace culture, and raise serious concerns about fairness and professionalism.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All