Your experience depends entirely on your manager. In my case, I dealt with an extremely technical and controlling manager who wouldn't let the team own their work. Rather than traditional micromanagement, it was a sophisticated form of control - disguised as technical guidance but effectively removing team autonomy.
Any common deployment error or configuration issue triggered disproportionate reactions. The manager constantly interfered with the Technical Manager's work through conflicting demands disguised as suggestions, undermining the established hierarchy.
He worked 24/7 (from 5 AM until late night) and while claiming not to demand this from the team, he subtly pressured for "protagonism" - a concept the company doesn't actually promote. The passive-aggressive communication style created a toxic environment where his words said one thing but expectations were another.
He displayed arrogance while denying it. If you can tolerate sophisticated control disguised as collaboration and passive-aggressive communication, it might work. Otherwise, I strongly recommend avoiding this area.
