Applied Materials reviews

3.9

78% would recommend to a friend

(4,557 total reviews)
avatar

Gary Dickerson

86% approve of CEO

73% positive business outlook

Applied Materials has an employee rating of 3.9 out of 5 stars, based on 4,557 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Applied Materials employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Manufactura industry (3.5 stars).

Reviews by job title

5K reviews
3.0
Jan 25, 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great people and products. Global leader.

Cons

Constant focus on reducing costs has cost the company a lot. People are treated like expenses and not like assets. Constant layoffs

1.0
May 31, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

This job = product engineer + quality engineer (SQE + CQE + NPI quality) + reliability engineer + TPM

Cons

The Quality & Reliability (Q&R) organization has a high concentration of Indian managers. Employee turnover rates are very high, with several people leaving teams every year and few "US persons" left. There are safety concerns about retaliation from managers if negative feedback is provided to HR. During interview processes, candidates may not get to interact with current team members to get a sense of the group culture. The role involves collaborating with process engineering teams on product development programs (PDP). However, due to high turnover on those teams, it can be difficult to obtain needed data and analysis support. There are complaints that in meetings, the management team consisting of the VP, directors, and managers ask overly details unrelated to the Q&R role, which most view as demeaning and demanding. Requests for assistance from leadership are sometimes met with being redirected elsewhere rather than direct support. Workloads can be very high, with some engineers handling 30-100 emails per day in addition to being assigned multiple programs across time zones, resulting in very long work hours (7 am -11 pm). There are perceptions that managers do not provide adequate resources yet criticize subordinates' time & project management and technical abilities. Some view certain managers as excelling more at political maneuvering than providing clear leadership functions and value. Overall, the work environment and management culture in this Q&R organization are perceived negatively by employees. High turnover, heavy workloads, retaliation, and performance criticism from managers are common experiences reported.

2.0
May 9, 2024

No more WFH benefit. Bad culture

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good colleagues and team. Good learning opportunity as a stepping stone

Cons

- Company CEO removed hybrid work suddenly, not even allowing 1 day WFH. Ignoring employee well-being and inclusion. - says that company still offer great flexibility for those who can WFH. But if the company policy is 100% onsite, will mgrs even allow WFH? A big NO. - company future way of work is hotdesking but requires 100% onsite? How is this possible? Clearly, ignornant about where everyone’s gonna sit. Throwing everyone to fight and scramble for a seat. How is this a good company culture and conducive environment? - Higher management not listening to the voices on ground. Having hybrid work is the greatest flexibility applied can provide. - politics between cross functional team. - management always going back on their words and directives (eg. implementing WFH hybrid but decided to take back, stating project deadline but decided to expedite for sooner closure)

Viewing 25 - 27 of 4,557 Reviews

Glassdoor has 5,372 Applied Materials reviews submitted anonymously by Applied Materials employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Applied Materials is right for you.