Amazon reviews

3.5

60% would recommend to a friend

(209,096 total reviews)
avatar

Andrew Jassy

50% approve of CEO

57% positive business outlook

Amazon has an employee rating of 3.5 out of 5 stars, based on 209,096 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Amazon employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Tecnologías de la información industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

209K reviews
1.0
Jun 3, 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

You learn every critical retail function, from site merchandising and marketing to instock management and forecasting. Given Amazon fast paced work culture, you learn a ton, quickly. I've learned more in my almost 2 years at the company than 3-4 years elsewhere. This is a great place to be if you value learning and want to optimize for learning in your career: the career progression opportunities abound if you perform well. Competitive name on resume, intelligent coworkers, fast paced culture where you are consistently challenged, flexible work hours

Cons

The salary is quite low when compared to hours worked. Amazon's compensation is awarded over time (4 years), where compensation comes with a lower base pay, stock and signing bonus. The average Amazon employee lasts 2 years, so you may not realize all these benefits. Stocks don’t vest completely until you have completed 4 years with the company. 401k match is not earned until 3 years of service. Sign on bonus isn't earned until you complete 1 full year with the company. If you leave or are forced out prior, it must be repaid on a pro-rated, annualized basis. Relocation bonus and expenses also have to be paid back if you leave within 2 years (pro-rated). Amazon espouses frugality and uses these deceptive tactics to lock talent into a contract where employees are promised fake money, awarded over a very long period of time, during which many employees either quit, or are forced out of the company. In regard to compensation, I would push to come in as an L5 Brand Manager instead of L4 Brand Specialist. L5s typically come in at an $84K annual salary + stock, whereas L4s are usually $65K + $20K signing bonus + stock. Total compensation between the roles is almost the same – with one key difference. Within 2 years as a brand specialist, you have to get a promotion to an L5 to have it make financial sense to continue (unless you want to take a $20K pay cut as the signing bonus is only valid for 2 years). Promotions at Amazon can be very challenging, so negotiating to an L5 upfront can be beneficial if you want to stay at Amazon long term. Also, annual increases are very minimal, on average 1-2% per year, if that each year. As an L4, you almost feel expendable, where the 1st 2 years are a test to see if you qualify to stay and the company and move up to a more steady pay grade as an L5. I would use prior work experience and top tier education to push to come in as an L5, one thing I wish I knew prior to joining Amazon. Lack of Appreciation: One of the primary drivers of attrition within this role. There is NO positive reinforcement at Amazon. On the occasional blue moon someone will pat you on the back and congratulate you for a great win (it is rare- believe me). If something goes wrong, it can be blown out of proportion and magnified. Can be demoralizing over time. Constant stress/anxiety: The bar at Amazon is constantly rising and you have to go above and beyond and constantly push yourself to make a name for yourself. Leadership and management have to know who you are, and the value you bring to the table. Stack ranking does occur during the annual review process, often times based on favoritism and can be political, at times. The work environment is competitive, cut throat, Darwinian (the strong survive, weak perish). I’ve seen people disappear, cry at their desk, get yelled at, and just walk out and leave the company. Amazon has a culture that embraces conflict, and disagreement amongst people – it’s very much and a love or hate place to work (little grey area between love or hate). If you embrace conflict, Amazon may be a great fit. High turnover: You have very limited time for family, social life, etc. due to work commitments. The expectation is that you are available 24/7, though no one will tell you this directly. Workload varies by team and time of year. I would not recommend Amazon as a place for someone who has a family, looking to start a family or enjoys having a social life. Even if you are sick, there is constant pressure to work (from home) and get stuff done. Incompetent management: Some managers do not know or have no experience managing teams, making it difficult to grow, develop and feel challenged. Constantly dealing with ambiguity. The company has a very self-reliant culture, so make sure you are comfortable managing ambiguous situations and can drive results. You teach yourself everything at Amazon, no one will hold your hand and walk you through things. There are a lot of type A personalities that when leading projects across leadership, you can be told 5 different things from 5 different people across teams. Gaining alignment across leadership and buying groups is a HUGE ISSUE and causes inefficiency when leading and executing projects. I would think hard about signing for this role or use it as a short term learning opportunity. Biggest challenge is as an L4 you feel like a workhorse or object and completely expendable, churning out work for leadership with almost no credit for it. Also, one IMPORTANT note: Amazon does not pay for the brand specialist role. It is paid for by the vendor through vendor funding (about $300K annually). So, to put simply, Amazon is MAKING money on this position (one of Amazon's core tenets is frugality). They will not tell you this upfront, but people usually find out after joining. In conversations with vendors, the typically re-evaluate whether they need the brand specialist role in annual negotiations, which can make you feel completely expendable. Respect in the workplace is vitally important, and unfortunately, Amazon doesn't have any of it.

1.0
Mar 7, 2013
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Very competitive salary for Seattle market

Cons

- Workload and work/life balance (was even worse than being at a big law firm) - Inadequate training - Uninteresting work (get ready to spend your days writing disclaimers) - Few perks - Unsupportive environment with virtually no secretarial or paralegal support - Cramped, noisy and dark offices - Endless goal setting and review processes that keep you from doing your work - Dishonest personnel misrepresented the nature of the job and the benefit/compensation packages I would be given during the interview process - Only 2 weeks paid vacation per year during first 2 years of employment - Dogs all over the office - if you don't like hearing/seeing/smelling other people's dogs all day, you'll be miserable

1.0
Jun 13, 2008
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The starting salary is extremely competitive. The hiring pipeline is also extremely efficient, empowering Amazon.com to court and successfully hire some of the smartest professionals out there. Unfortunately, those are the only positive thing I can say about the workplace itself. Outside of work, when you aren't getting paged up the wazoo by legacy applications no one in the company has any idea about, life is awesome. Seattle is a beautiful city with plenty of culture and no lack of things to do. A nice side effect of working at a place with insanely high turnover and high starting salary is that you end up with tons of young professionals, all new to the same environment and in the same stage of their lives ~ if you're one of them, there are plenty of people to meet and hang out with.

Cons

Amazon does not value its employees and this severely affects every aspect of worklife. Employees are treated as replaceable, renewable resources, not as members of a working team to grow with the company. The focus is on new hiring with the expectation that any semi-intelligent employee will leave within the first two years. New hire salary is incremented at well over 2x the rate that top members of a team are given raises. New folks regularly make 5-10K more than their tech leads who are the highest contributors on the team, breeding poor sentiment. Promotions are easily promised during crunch times requiring 100-hr work weeks and just as easily forgotten when promotion or bonus time actually does come around. Additional responsibility, both in person and in project management, are regularly compounded upon top contributors without promoting individuals to the authority such a position requires, making it difficult to get things done in a culture where cross-team cooperation is like pulling teeth. In terms of quality of work, there is no value given to developer time and no emphasis on the importance of infrastructure. Build tools are down daily and ownership is a lost concept. Scapegoating is a regular occurrence when site-wide post-mortems require heads to roll. Few things are properly documented, rarely anything is QA'ed, and as all original product engineers tend to leave within two years, nearly everything is a legacy application. The product-development lifecycle emphasizes pushing new features/products out quickly, leaving little or no time for QA cycles. The same engineers who coded the features under crunch are sometimes asked to do QA sign-off. Yet when they come back to management with lists of blocking/non-blocking bugs, they are asked to hide the lists and just to provide the sign-off. The result ends up being shoddy services held up by a company of already-overworked engineers serving constant on-call rotations who know they will be paged, but even knowing this are rarely able to figure out how to even begin debugging the systems. When I joined, every single person on the previous generation of my team had left. I later discovered that this was a regular occurrence which had already happened for the third time. All the great projects and career opportunities I had been sold on before joining were back-burner items reserved for interns and other people they had yet to sell a permanent position to. Regular employees were delegated to continuous on-call rotations for applications no one knew anything about and left to debugging bugs hardcoded years before. The overwork, stress, and lack of self-fulfillment created quite the back-stabbing team. In my first week as a new hire, I was angrily told by my mentor "Every time I sit down to get something done, you ask me a question." Later the same day, I was told by my manager "So I've talked to the team and they say you never talk to them or make use of their expertise ~ you simply putter in a stuck corner when you could just ask." As my time there progressed, I regularly discussed the lack of opportunities and the disparity between my expected and actual roles with my manager, who always promised clear action items to address my concerns ~ none of which ever happened. When I found a new team where I thought I could make a greater impact, my manager blocked my transfer, going all the way through HR to accuse of poaching. When I tried to leave the company, my manager tried to delay my resignation. Good stuff.

Viewing 76 - 78 of 209,096 Reviews

Glassdoor has 250,424 Amazon reviews submitted anonymously by Amazon employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Amazon is right for you.