Amazon reviews

3.5

60% would recommend to a friend

(209,096 total reviews)
avatar

Andrew Jassy

50% approve of CEO

57% positive business outlook

Amazon has an employee rating of 3.5 out of 5 stars, based on 209,096 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Amazon employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Tecnologías de la información industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

209K reviews
2.0
Apr 27, 2011
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Good sign-on bonus and initial stock awards - Opportunity to work with very large distributed systems (at uncommon scale) - Working for Amazon Web Services looks good on the resume - Opportunity to get better at operations and how to debug and fix issues more efficiently (although sometimes under a lot of pressure) - Learn development from end to end (design to deployment to operations) - Dynamic: depending on the team, you will have the feeling of being in a startup but without worrying about having money for your project.

Cons

- You do some development, but you are not a software developer. The title "software development engineer" is misleading and this is the first thing to be aware of when considering Amazon as employer. You may develop, but the vast majority of people spend most of their time doing other things, like fixing issues, testing, documenting, trying to plan the project, handling bureaucracy, adapting existing code, and doing some program and project manager work. After a few years at the company, I would say that I may have actually coded 10% of the time. You are more of a "software engineer", if this breadth of experience attracts you, but few will be technical experts that develop a lot. - Operation burden: there are teams that suffer with a lot of operation and the vast majority of developers need to be on-call – yes, you will be tied to a pager. The problem is that pager duty are usually 24 hours for 7 days and there is little to no respect from management about people that has to work around the clock. Don’t expect to have follow-the-sun model or any other arrangements unless things are very ugly (particularly true for AWS). Just to give you some numbers, there are teams that get paged more than once every hour of the day (yes, 25+ pages a day). You are expected to be online in a few minutes, so don't think that running a quick errand while on-call is a good idea if you are on such a team. - Long hours: examples are better than just saying things here. These were rewarded in AWS' all-hands meetings: a developer who called in to help debugging a ticket during his daughter's wedding and another developer that was working while his wife's baby delivery. This is the message that is sent and the bar is set so high about the dedication that, if you try to meet it, your life will be your work. Many do, especially if they are young. Some seem even think it’s worth the effort. - Long-term compensation: Amazon typically offers good sign-on bonuses and initial stock awards, but what is not said is that these bonuses and awards are going to be used in the following years not to give you any additional bonuses (manager’s talk is "including your shares and sign-on bonus, your compensation this year is pretty good, so I can't give you anything else"). There isn't cash bonus during performance review and, when managers give you stock awards, they are much lower than your initial stock awards. - Short-sighted: although Jeff Bezos is visionary, Amazon is still not a technology company and all development is target at the near future and how much revenue it will bring. Some AWS platforms would require much long term investment and vision to be more reliable or develop the in-house expertise, but they are often rushed for the business sake, which affects a lot of technical decisions. Although backed by a multi-billion business, Amazon is still not the company that will invest a few years into an effort without seeing the dollar value of that venture. - Lack of QA teams: since it's short-sighted, QA is very much below what one would expect for such large company with such systems - especially if we are talking about infrastructure for so many other companies, like AWS is. It's not uncommon to see tens of SDEs without a single person dedicated to testing (QA engineer, SDETs). - No learning/training on the job: do not expect to have much chance of learning on the job. You must do it on your own if you want your career to progress. - Career progression: your chances of career progression vary substantially depending on the business. Retail, AWS, and Digital are very different in terms of promotion and, depending on your group, the bar may be so high that it seems impossible to meet it in practice. That opens up a lot of opportunities for politics to take place. You may be stuck in your position for many and many years – do not be surprised to see competent people being SDE II for 10+ years, without prospects of any advancement. Also bear in mind that, although you can transfer internally, in practice that resets your history, so you better put up with your current team and do what your manager wants if you want to have any chance of being promoted. - Benefits/Frugality: they are OK, but nothing compared to other companies. You will have 6 paid holidays – no day after Thanksgiving for you, for instance. You will have to pay for your coffee at the company meeting. Good, but not the best hardware for your development – it’s not uncommon to see people paying out of their pockets for keyboard, more memory, better chair, and sometimes even buying or bringing monitors from home. Depending on the org, you will be able to expense books, but oftentimes it will be so much work to get your manager’s approval (including proving that it’s work related) that will not be worth all the effort. Team lunch? Be prepared to chip in as team events are rare and, not uncommon, your manager’s budget will not cover it all.

1.0
Sep 7, 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Maybe it will look good on your resume. There are a lot of data and you may be able to do an interesting analysis (only if you are patient enough to wait for your query to run; see below). Work-life balance was not bad for me. There are a few smart and honest people.

Cons

Almost everything I wanted to say is in this review by another "research scientist II" on Aug 11, 2014 (Glassdoor does not allow a link in the review; filter reviews with "research scientist II"). Noise level is terrible because of overcrowded office with ridiculously noisy SDEs who have no notion that there may be somebody who needs a quiet environment for his work. We don't have access to academic journals and conference papers, and we need to ask people in academia to get a copy, which I believe is against the policy of publishers. 3yr vesting of 401k matching contributions was what I did not know before I left and what I regret the most. Amazon claims itself to be the world's most costumer-centric company. That in turn implies it does not care much about the employees. Basically, employees are dispensable and replaceable. Company is not investing enough for its internal infrastructures, because they are not directly connected to customer satisfaction. Databases have much less processing capacity than what is needed; the situation worsened much more since 2013 and it is not a surprise if it takes more than a few hours to run a very simple SQL query. I wonder how people, especially data scientist type of people, do their work with such a poor environment. Note that work environments for research scientists may be quite different depending on what area you are in. For machine learning and computer vision researchers, the company seems to be relaxing its strict policy on publications. However, on more traditional supply chain area that I was in, nothing seems to be changing; after all, we are probably not doing state-of-the-art research that is worth publishing. We are just coming up with ad-hoc patches for problems, without understanding anything and accumulating any knowledge. Promotions are rare and it looks tougher for research scientists compared to SDEs. While SDEs have clearer measurements on their work, it is often unclear how to measure the contribution of research scientists' work. Management, which is dominated by MBA-type of people, does not understand the value of long-term research and they are only looking at short-term cost savings, which are often estimated based on dubious calculations using inaccurate financial figures. There is no career path for research scientists. Internal transfers to other groups should be a good opportunity for employees to grow, but from my experiences, people are generally narrow-minded and reject you when you do not have past experiences in the exact area, even if you have good records of performance reviews. They basically treat you as just another external candidate. One last thing. My employment was terminated 2 days after I submitted a formal letter of resignation, even though I was requesting to leave one week later. Not only I lost 1 week of income, I also lost health insurance coverage one month earlier, because I would have been covered until the end of month if I quitted in the beginning of the month as I planned, but they have "fired" me in the end of previous month and the insurance was terminated at the same time. I didn't even have an exit interview. I couldn't believe how badly the company treats me after more than 2 years of service. Beware, because this can happen to a person like me, who was performing well enough to get promoted just several months ago. This whole thing illustrates how the company disregards its employees.

1.0
Mar 5, 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Fast-pace company, lots of Jobs opportunities

Cons

Advertisement for Jobs should say: Are you a workaholic? Do you like working every evening and on weekends? Are you single with no kids? Then come to work with us! Especially with Product Managers positions, goals are totally stretched, there is no time to invest in trainings/learnings, everybody is overloaded. And don't take me wrong, I always enjoyed being busy, but this is totally insane! As Luxembourg is in between business in US and Europe, you have meetings during the day with Europe and at night with Seattle. During the weekend is when you can finish your work (lots of reports to do, montly results for ALL stakeholders, quartly results, etc). Everything is for now, or maybe tomorrow. I have worked in other two big companies and I have never seen something like this. Salary seems good at first, but for the hours I"m putting, I am probably paid like a cashier of a fast food restaurant. Before joining I read some similar experience here but I decided to give it a try. Big mistake. All people say about no work life balance is true. If you are considering a job in Amazon, double check the team you are entering, hours they have to put, etc. There are some rare exceptions in other teams, but be aware!!

Viewing 73 - 75 of 209,096 Reviews

Glassdoor has 250,424 Amazon reviews submitted anonymously by Amazon employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Amazon is right for you.