Amazon reviews

3.5

60% would recommend to a friend

(209,539 total reviews)
avatar

Andrew Jassy

50% approve of CEO

57% positive business outlook

Amazon has an employee rating of 3.5 out of 5 stars, based on 209,539 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Amazon employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Tecnologías de la información industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

210K reviews
3.0
Jan 11, 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- You get the brand name on your resume which for some reason is seen as a big deal in the industry (especially if you don't have a FAANG company on your resume) - Teams vary, but my team personally had some good understanding teammates.

Cons

TLDR: Don't join here unless you like a lot of work which being undervalued, or just need a FAANG company on your resume. - Management is a complete death match, with their only objective being stock price. - You're essentially seen as cattle in a farm for them to use. Completely disgusting the way employees are treated or valued - On-call is almost a guarantee on every team and it's usually 24/7 for a week. You need to carry your laptop around anywhere you go and you can be paged at odd hours to solve something complicated and still expected to show up the next day to work. - Any indication of "mental health" or looking after employees is nothing more than a formality and an after thought - Pay is completely garbage when you account the impact of oncall and the hours you work daily (they might say you should only work 40 hours, but give you 60 hours of work anyway and get you fired if you don't complete it) - Management blatantly lies or mis-guides you with their own personal interest while telling you, you will succeed by putting your team contribution above yours. - I can go on and on...

1.0
Jun 18, 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The sign-on bonus is good money, plus a few shares

Cons

Everything at Amazon Web Services is intensely political. Any critical decision has to go through multiple internal stakeholders who will not allow the company to help a customer if it's not possible to claim credit for it. The leadership principles at Amazon Web Services are a complete lie. Deliver Results is a lie: at AWS, as long as you claim to be doing something, that's fine. The company grows so fast, and things change so quickly, that the most important activities are (1) looking busy and (2) communicating that you are busy. Nobody will check. Have Backbone; Disagree and Commit: this principle is about solving conflicts, but it's actually a stick waved by managers when somebody has a different opinion. It's not about commitment, it's about obeying; this principle is there to make sure you can never contradict your manager. Dive Deep: AWS is not a data driven company. Nobody looks at data. The important thing is to shout big numbers, and people won't ask details; if they ask an explanation for the data, remind them to Disagree and Commit. Earn Trust: Earn Trust is the catch-all principle which gets weaponised when you have data supporting your ideas. If your manager is incompetent, you can either Disagree and Commit or get flagged for "failing at Earn Trust". Frugality: money at AWS doesn't matter, and this principle is just another empty excuse for going against a new idea. Bias for Action: this principle manages to turn AWS into complete chaos. If somebody else wants your job, they will start invading yours in the name of "bias for action". Soon they will be able to claim that you needed help, and maybe even make a case to be your boss. And remember, claiming to do your job at AWS comes before Delivering Results. Think Big: at AWS, Thinking Big doesn't exist. If there is no money to be made, in no way will AWS embark in a Think Big idea. And forget about Long Term: AWS exists firmly for short term revenue, and it's not different from Oracle. Insist on the Highest Standards: this is how highest standards work at AWS; if you insist on the highest standards, you get fired. The only people at AWS who need to uphold some standard are in some Services teams in the US - a few technical teams actually know what they are doing, and keep the company running. Hire and Develop the Best: AWS is a very flat organisation. If you actually end up hiring the best, it's very easy to park somebody and claim that they are "the same as anybody else". And if you have better ideas? More knowledge? More data? Guess what: "Earn Trust". Your talent and expertise don't matter at AWS, and don't even think about meritocracy. Learn and Be Curious: at AWS you get continuous training. No project management, no product management, but random training on every single product or offer coming out in the market. Is it useful for your career? Only if you stay at AWS. 90 of the training is NOT transferable. Are Right, A Lot: this is valid for managers. If you are not a manager and you are right, you can guess what happens. Invent and Simplify: AWS sells storage and compute. They hire people without any education to sell storage and compute. There is no invention, and the only simplification is in the minds of the salespeople. How a Big Tech can have such a low bar for its leadership is beyond anybody's guess. Ownership: this works very well with "Bias for Action". If somebody else starts doing your job and shows commitment, they will soon own it. You will be in continuous competition, and most of your energy will go in keeping your job safe from those who want to take it over. Customer Obsession: customers exist to give AWS money. If the revenue is not there to justify 50 YoY growth, customers will be ignored. If the customer wants to work with an APN partner member who is not managed by the salesperson, the account manager will suggest a completely unrelated partner. With all the politics going on, with the continuous abuse and re-abuse of Leadership Principles, AWS can only work as a self-service. As a business, it's nothing more than a kakistocracy, kept together by its service teams. The only principles at AWS are "lie, cheat and steal your way up". And good luck to you if you don't live in the US - AWS can and will discriminate against you if you are not American or if you are not based in Seattle. Your ideas, your talent, your contributions will always matter less than your office location. And don't worry if you are a woman who wants to join AWS - you WILL be discriminated against, in case you had doubts. The hiring and promotion processes are completely opaque, and it's very easy to twist feedback to decline hiring a woman or a foreigner.

1.0
Aug 23, 2019

Horrible work culture that places perception over everything else

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Good salary package - Good brand-name - Being part of a new and growing field in Tech

Cons

- Work culture is heavily diluted from the ideals set forth by Amazon, culture is no longer about placing Customers first (as per Amazon's 1st Leadership Principle of Customer Obsession) as it has now turned into deliver results (revenue) above all else even if it means acting in the disbenefit of customers. - Work culture has a heavy slant towards office politics, no longer can you just focus on doing what you do best but you have to play the office politics game of winning favors from others including your managers and "appearing" to be a "good employee", in short, actual competency comes secondary to the appearance of it - Heavy focus on meeting numbers and revenue, AWS now feels as though its another of those Day 2 companies (e.g Oracle) that has stopped trying to do what is right but rather desperately trying to cling onto the status quo - Managers run their departments like their own personal fiefdoms, little to no accountability seen from their decisions taken (at least from the ground) and an employee's experience can vary drastically from one manager to another which indicates a dilution of organization culture, turning the organization into silos of disparate culture that stems from the managers. - Managers seems to be far more interested in short-term results in order for them to report up and for themselves to look good to higher management, I don't think that they are acting in the interest of the long-term goals of the company or their employees. - Highly transactional environment where an individual isn't appreciated as a person but looked at as just another number on the paper,. - Having said the above, an employee's experience varies greatly depending on your manager, if you happen to get a good and supportive manager, then you'll likely enjoy your work and being in AWS but if you don't then you'll hate it, which is why there is such high turn-over and super short tenure in certain departments over another. - Lack of co-operation between the different departments within the organization as all of them have very different KPIs and agendas that doesn't necessarily tie into a unified goal, hence you find departments actively pushing back when you're seeking assistance in something that doesn't contribute to their KPI. - Too much of a shout-out, kudos and rara-ing culture, its all about visibility and self-promotion within the organization and its honestly nauseating.

Viewing 397 - 399 of 209,539 Reviews

Glassdoor has 250,995 Amazon reviews submitted anonymously by Amazon employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Amazon is right for you.