Skip to contentSkip to footer
  • Community
  • Jobs
  • Companies
  • Salaries
  • For Employers
      Notifications

      Loading...

      Elevate your career

      Discover your earning potential, land dream jobs, and share work-life insights anonymously.

      employer cover photo
      employer logo
      employer logo

      Crossover for Work

      Engaged Employer

      About
      Reviews
      Pay & benefits
      Jobs
      Interviews
      Interviews
      Related searches: Crossover for Work reviews | Crossover for Work jobs | Crossover for Work salaries | Crossover for Work benefits
      Crossover for Work interviewsCrossover for Work SVP of Non-Technical Operations interviewsCrossover for Work interview


      Glassdoor

      • About / Press
      • Awards
      • Blog
      • Research
      • Contact Us
      • Guides

      Employers

      • Free Employer Account
      • Employer Center
      • Employers Blog

      Information

      • Help
      • Guidelines
      • Terms of Use
      • Privacy & Ad Choices
      • Do Not Sell Or Share My Information
      • Cookie Consent Tool
      • Security

      Work With Us

      • Advertisers
      • Careers
      Download the App

      • Browse by:
      • Companies
      • Jobs
      • Locations
      • Communities
      • Recent Posts

      Copyright © 2008-2026. Glassdoor LLC. "Glassdoor," "Worklife Pro," "Bowls," and logo are proprietary trademarks of Glassdoor LLC.

      Company Bowl sample

      Want the inside scoop on your own company?

      Check out your Company Bowl for anonymous work chats.

      Bowls

      Get actionable career advice tailored to you by joining more bowls.

      Followed companies

      Stay ahead in opportunities and insider tips by following your dream companies.

      Job searches

      Get personalized job recommendations and updates by starting your searches.

      SVP of Non-Technical Operations Interview

      Jul 11, 2023
      Anonymous Interview Candidate
      No offer
      Negative experience
      Difficult interview

      Application

      I applied online. The process took 5 days. I interviewed at Crossover for Work in Jun 2023

      Interview

      Crossover is a company that knows how to grab attention in a highly competitive job market. With posts promising extremely attractive salaries ($400,000 USD / year), the company is able to lure an astounding number of applicants from a wide range of developing countries. But careful! Do not get caught in their spamming trap. Firstly, Crossover's recruiting method is shotgun marketing. They fire their job postings across multiple platforms, in countless cities spanning over 30 countries. On top of this, they continually delete and repost these positions to maintain visibility, essentially flooding the job market. While it might seem like they're casting a wide net to capture diverse talent, the reality is that they're spammers and predators. The company targets developing economies. Crossover uses the appeal of their hefty salaries as a potent bait. This aggressive recruitment strategy seems to generate more quantity than quality, They exploit the aspirations of people in these economies. The biggest drawback lies in the staggering level of competition. So just some rough numbers: they post at 5 job sites, in 30 countries, 5 cities per country, 30 posts per month, 10 job appplicants per post. That's north of 200,000 applicants for only one vacancy. Sure, if you're a top 1% applicant, you might feel optimistic, but consider this: even among this elite group, the competition remains fierce with approximately 2,000 contenders. That leaves you with a 0.05% chance of getting the job. Crossover's strategy of offering high salaries might seem alluring at first glance, but the sheer level of competition, coupled with questionable tactics, makes the promise of landing a job more of a mirage than a genuine opportunity. Don't fall for this trap!

      Interview questions [1]

      Question 1

      You answer a 15 min IQ test, followed by two english proficciency exams, then an extremely bad designed "Business Acumen" test. Followed by a test for lawyers that measures Critical Thinking. Finally you answer two business cases. The first one is very basic reorganization and cost cutting exercise. And the second one is writting a prompt for ChatGPT. Both cases seem extremely simple compared the pay grade, which IMO makes it suspicious... Either they don't know how to design proper business cases as McKinsey, Bain, or BCG would do.... or they are simply conducting a Big Data experiment and the position is non-existent.
      Answer question
      2