World Bank Group reviews

4.1

83% would recommend to a friend

(2,935 total reviews)

Ajay Banga

84% approve of CEO

74% positive business outlook

World Bank Group has an employee rating of 4.1 out of 5 stars, based on 2,935 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an excellent working experience there. The World Bank Group employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Finanzas industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

3K reviews
1.0
Oct 30, 2023

Avoid IFC if you are a young professional

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great mandate, colleagues from all over the world. Generous leave

Cons

I would strongly discourage young professionals from joining the IFC. While it has generous perks for staff who have been around for a while, the organisation is moving to short term fixed contracts for all staff, and pushing staff towards the regions, creating great instability and a lot of your career opportunities at the discretion of your manager. The situation is even worse for colleagues on contract work. I didn't find the IFC to be a meritocracy. In my experience, a lot of junior staff carried huge workloads while lazy and/or incompetent senior staff took the credit for their work and flew around to deal signings and conferences. There are some great managers of course, but many are very poor and have limited people management skills. Professional development within the organisation is limited. Because it is difficult to fire staff, the lazy staff/poor managers remain in the organisation and create a toxic environment for everyone else. I also experienced discrimination based on my nationality, and as a staff member without a family. Local staff in country offices often have to do the same work as international staff but for much lower salaries/benefits, and instead of rewarding field experience in country offices at the end of your contract, often jobs in DC are given to those already in DC, so you may find yourself stuck if you aren't working somewhere you want to stay permanently. There are extremely limited promotion/progression opportunities within the IFC - to be promoted a new job has to be advertised and you have to apply for it, so you need a supportive manager. This also means many of the job listings on the IFC career website already have candidates identified, although that is not noted. This wastes a LOT of time and is also not a transparent/fair process. Note, if you enter as an analyst, you will need a masters degree to progress beyond the GE level, but the IFC will provide no support in obtaining this, and will not guarantee you a role on your return. Finally, if you decide to leave the IFC/your contract is not renewed I found that the experience is not valued in the market/private sector, and you may not be able to stay in the location you were based in with the IFC, so have to form your professional network again. The World Bank HR and tax office are unhelpful and unresponsive - sometimes taking over a month to respond to calls or email queries on important matters like tax requirements, visas and pay which created unnecessary stress and uncertainty. Payroll is also unreliable - I have seen multiple situations where the wrong benefits were paid and it was just lucky I / the other staff members noticed so that this could be corrected.

4.0
May 21, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The exposure and importance of projects is not comparable to most jobs in the market except for perhaps the IMF or the ILO. I received constant constructive feedback that improved my economic analysis and writing skills. Compared to academia or think-tanks, you can truly make an impact in your areas of passion (i.e. whether it's in health, labor policy, etc..) Compared to my prior jobs in academia or private sector, most WB workers are truly driven and passionate about their work, which motivates to you work on yourself and grow further.

Cons

There is simply no work-life balance, even seniors in my department typically worked on a typical Saturday/Sunday afternoon. As a result, as a junior researcher, you are not only implicitly expected to check your phone/email until 10 pm on weekdays but also regularly respond to emails on weekends. You may wonder what happens if you don't? Well, you will not confronted about it directly, but an email chain of 8-9 emails will have been exchanged on the weekend and the conversation on Monday morning will start from where the 9th email exchange has ended. In other words, even if you don't read your e-mails on weekends, you will miss out and be confused as hell on weekdays, and thus you are expected to check your emails every hour on weekends. Some but not all seniors like to constantly keep ETCs and STCs on "their toes" by not telling them about a contract renewal until the week before the expiration, and the rationale is to avoid making juniors enter a "comfort zone," which comes at a huge mental cost for juniors.

2.0
Dec 16, 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

If you are working at the WBG as a genuine independent consultant (i.e. you have other clients, you work autonomously, and you're working on specific deliverables) then it's great. Good pay, interesting work.

Cons

The WBG is absolutely shameless about using STCs as a "cheap workforce" . . . hiring them for staff roles, integrating them into teams, having them do the same work as their full-time colleagues, but calling them "consultants" and not giving them any of the benefits or protections that come with being an actual employee. They have no qualms about using STC as "cheap, easy" substitutes for full-time staff, dangling promises of eventual full-time employment as a carrot to put up with STC misuse and mistreatment. FWIW, this is super illegal in most countries (google "employee misclassification") but due to their immunities they cannot be sued for labor law violations (and boy do they know it!) Beyond this, stories of STC abuse, including wage theft, harassment, and retaliation are rampant. Again, if you work as a true consultant, it's fine, but if you're working as a de facto staff member, make a plan to get out within a year or two.

Viewing 67 - 69 of 2,935 Reviews

Glassdoor has 5,054 World Bank Group reviews submitted anonymously by World Bank Group employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if World Bank Group is right for you.