Sur La Table reviews

corporate to0 demanding for salary offered

I went through a series of three interviews with the company—first with the recruiter, followed by the IT lead, and finally with the IT director. A few weeks later, I received a rejection letter. However, a week after that, the recruiter reached out again, asking if I was still interested in the role. This raised concerns for me, as it reflected a lack of coordination and professionalism on their part—something I should have recognized as a red flag regarding their management practices. During my first week, I met the team and the IT lead, and I was genuinely impressed by their technical expertise. I naturally respected them, as they were people I could learn from. However, the IT lead was only present for a few days before returning to the state where he worked remotely. That’s when reality set in. The two IT support technicians at the BDC warehouse showed little interest in helping me grow. Their body language and silence made it obvious that they were irritated whenever I asked questions or sought guidance. They even advised me to ‘just relax’ for the first three to four weeks, which was frustrating, as I was eager to learn about their network topology and there broad range ot technologies. Meanwhile, they spent their time watching YouTube, discussing fantasy football, using nicotine pouches, and engaging in inappropriate, non-work-related conversations. Occasionally, they would ask for my opinions on sensitive topics like politics, which in hindsight was a mistake on my part to entertain. What I thought were open discussions were, in fact, the start of a deceptive malicious scheme. They later reported my views—views they specifically asked for—to HR and the IT director, twisting the narrative. Ironically, these same technicians openly made derogatory offensive remarks about the LGBTQ community. I had initially believed that there was a degree of openness in our conversations. They even shared stories about a previous IT employee from Venezuela who chose not to engage with them but are glad I'm willing to socially engage with them. Now, I understand why. These technicians, along with the IT director, displayed subtle prejudices behavior and manipulated the situation to have me terminated. They fed HR and management false information, and, unsurprisingly, their claims were taken at face value due to their longer tenure at the company. This experience highlighted a harsh reality of corporate life—trust is often elusive. People will go to great lengths—whether to protect their egos or advance their careers—even if it means betraying others. Perhaps these technicians felt threatened by my quick learning abilities, or maybe they were uncomfortable with my race and cultural background. I suspect it was a combination of both. Unfortunately, this type of behavior is not uncommon in environments where diversity of thought and background is unfamiliar or undervalued.I would advise against investing time in applications to this company, as it appears to be primarily funded by privileged trust funds rather than driven by substantial business acumen or merit.