NASA reviews

4.4

86% would recommend to a friend

(1,788 total reviews)
avatar

Charles F. Bolden, Jr.

82% approve of CEO

58% positive business outlook

NASA has an employee rating of 4.4 out of 5 stars, based on 1,788 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an excellent working experience there. The NASA employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Gobierno y administración pública industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

2K reviews
3.0
Jun 12, 2017

NASA IS.

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great place to work. You learn a lot .

Cons

Office culture is good ole boy network. No contractor conversion . Under performers and office politics hinder growth. No real leadership. No newness, age old employees who refuse to change. New ideas ignored even when old ways are ineffective. Government beauracracy. Doesn't effectively recognize or prevent issues before becomes grave catastrophe. Doesn't allow outsiders and recycled same poor leadership and bad ideology.

3.0
Apr 2, 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The NASA brand is recognized worldwide. The agency has a great PR machine that advertises the work being done. People will stop you and thank you for what you're doing. Outreach through NASA is fun and rewarding because it ignites the imagination of explorers of all demographics. Lots of development programs and still some good engineers and leaders present that want to mentor and help their employees grow. If you just want to do research and don't mind not having a clear path to have your research turn into technologies that could be incorporated on missions, it's a good place to explore your ideas. NASA is still the leader in driving the direction of the aerospace industry (though that seems to be shifting lately). As an employee you'll have the opportunity to see what's going on across the agency and in industry. Work life balance can be reasonable. Some members of senior management are waking up to the systemic problems and trying to change for the better.

Cons

The can-do attitude of the past is waning. People are afraid to take risks. Major programs that are failing are taking funding away from the technological investments that are needed to take us further into the solar system or advance scientific discovery. No one wants to stand up and say that the programs are failing because they're afraid of upsetting congressional constituents. NASA is a bait and switch. Advertisements and recruiting info say NASA is doing all these incredible missions and technology development. What they really should say is NASA is buying these incredible missions and technology development. This works for some people. If you're ok with exploring concepts that likely will never go beyond concept stage, work at NASA. If you're ok with writing requirements and then watching prime contractors do the design and development work from the periphery, work at NASA. If you want to contribute your own ideas, see them come to life and fly in space, don't work at NASA. Those opportunities are sparse if not non existent. So much inertia in the very aged workforce that most efforts to do things differently and more efficiently will likely be squashed or the people trying to do things better will get burnt out and leave. There is no incentive for dealing with poor performers. If you're in a PR, outreach, administrative or oversight role, morale is great. If you're in a technical position, morale is not as great.

1.0
Mar 6, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Exceptionally easy work, easy to stand out as a high performer, decent benefits

Cons

General schedule pay scale for civil servants is not even remotely competitive anymore, especially on the archaic standard step scale. Promotions are almost entirely tenure based, nothing is really built around performance. There is no reward for exceptional performance besides more work and managers taking credit for your work. In addition to this the center has pretty much eliminated the technical promotion pathway in favor of saving the available GS14 and 15 levels for our over abundance of management roles. Labs are generally empty as we don't hire anyone capable of doing hands on work anymore in favor of contract managers and oversight roles. Most of the strong technical talent is being pillaged by the growing space industry across the US and especially in the local Huntsville area. Also there's a ton of infighting and territorialism at every level: center level, lab level, division level, and team level. Honestly I'm surprised anything was ever accomplished by all the arguing and stovepiping on who is "allowed" to do what.

Viewing 7 - 9 of 1,788 Reviews

Glassdoor has 3,234 NASA reviews submitted anonymously by NASA employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if NASA is right for you.