Merck reviews

4.1

83% would recommend to a friend

(6,155 total reviews)
avatar

Rob Davis

82% approve of CEO

71% positive business outlook

Merck has an employee rating of 4.1 out of 5 stars, based on 6,155 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an excellent working experience there. The Merck employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Farmacéutica y biotecnología industry (3.5 stars).

Reviews by job title

6K reviews
4.0
Aug 16, 2009
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The company does provide opportunities to grow, and many managers support rotations throughout different parts of the organization. Merck pays well.

Cons

1) I can't say roles and responsibilities are always clear -- too many people trying to create busy work; Merck is definitely over resourced in some areas. 2) Management, especially middle management, is not well experience, seasoned, nor mature. They create a lot of overhead to justify their roles in the system. 3) Direction from management is never clear. Initiaitives from management will make their way down through the system, and they middle management spin to understand how to deliver a product of value. Perhaps point 2 contributes to the problem again.

3.0
Aug 16, 2009
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Company is flexible with family / working from home. Pretty generous with vacation and flexible if you need a day off for having worked longer hours on a tough project. Lots of smart folks work there, but it's not too portentous a place. Good health benefits, and benefits in general.

Cons

No in place promotions? In the past few years, times have been tougher and they've been skimping on training...as an IT professional staying up to date on what's current is crucial. Getting management to send developers to training / conferences on new development technologies is like pulling teeth. Management doesn't want people developing applications for scientists, rather they want to buy global solutions for nearly every possible situation, which is a recipe for disaster. For scientific research software development that is done in house, there's no emphasis on code reviews / writing good code / applying any development methodologies as a team; a lot of code for lab and science-specific apps gets done by single individuals (this might not be the case for teams writing clinical applications or company infrastructure applications, like internal websites). Be careful about what you're getting yourself into if you're into writing software. I'm not saying that all positions at Merck are bad for IT, just be careful to ask questions about the position before hand about working with a group or possibilities for development-specific training if you're into software development. More politics and in-fighting than you could ever believe. Place is rife with bureaucrats at all levels; some folks seem more interested in playing games than getting their job done, although this is probably typical of many large companies.

4.0
Jul 26, 2009
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

When it comes to overall benefits and work/life balance Merck is going to provide that to you. Real attempts to position the representatives in a different light while providing additional trainings and educational opportunities.

Cons

Struggling pipeline in late stages. Tremendous transition coming with the merger of Schering-Plough, a lot of unknown and uncertainty with employees. Over weighted employee population thus there will be more lay offs.

Viewing 6010 - 6012 of 6,155 Reviews

Glassdoor has 8,167 Merck reviews submitted anonymously by Merck employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Merck is right for you.