employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Lockheed Martin

Is this your company?

Lockheed Martin reviews

4.1

83% would recommend to a friend

(14,501 total reviews)
avatar

James D. Taiclet

81% approve of CEO

72% positive business outlook

Lockheed Martin has an employee rating of 4.1 out of 5 stars, based on 14,501 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an excellent working experience there. The Lockheed Martin employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Aeroespacial y defensa industry (3.6 stars).

Reviews by job title

15K reviews
1.0
Nov 10, 2017

Career Suicide

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

cool products, good work-life balance

Cons

My advice is to avoid this place like the plague unless your goal is to coast until retirement while working on extremely outdated tech. As an engineer, working at Lockheed for more than about 5 years is career suicide if you have aspirations to work at a real tech company. You would have been working on tech that was cutting edge 20 years ago. Prospective future employers who do actually contact you will certainly ask "Why did you work at Lockheed Martin?" in a way that sounds like "Why did you work at a garbage dump?" The implication is that you're supposed to defend why you worked at such a bad company filled with mostly lazy people who want to coast until retirement. You'll have to explain that you were one of the few people who weren't like the majority there. Additionally, Lockheed only values how many years you have been working, and merit is completely ignored by management. Anyone smart quickly leaves and every location I visited was filled with only old people about to retire along with a small number of clueless new college hires who haven't caught on to how bad their job is yet. It was my first job but luckily I escaped after realizing what this place was about without too much damage to my career.

1.0
Sep 21, 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Flexible work schedule and relatively secure positions

Cons

Horrifyingly outdated hardware, software, and engineering practices (40+ years in some cases). Government contract work feels more like trying to find excuses to spend money rather than actually trying to create a better product. Most new hires are shoved onto mindless paperwork tasks (filling out forms, updating documentation, collecting signatures) since there is so little engineering to go around. Culture is stagnant (remnants of a baby boomer company) and most buildings are depressingly brutalist, many lacking even tinted/frosted windows. Pay is also not very competitive with other engineering employers.

1.0
Jan 13, 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

401K offered and matched up to 6%. Employee Scholar Program currently offered is beneficial, although it has changed drastically in 2015. Middle Management works hard to ensure direct report employees are taken care of to the best of their ability. Original Keystone Helicopter Managers that survived the Sikorsky buyout are some of the best in the business, but limited remain due to recent layoff in September 2015. The remaining maintenance techs and avionics techs that survived the recent layoff in Sept 2015 are some of the best in the business.

Cons

Senior Leadership is not checked in, and have run this once powerful asset into the ground in the Commercial Helicopter Production/Completions group. The senior leadership position in Operations was filled with management from the northern facility, with no experience in Corporate Aircraft Production/Completions. Absolutely zero time by this position is spent on the floor with middle management and technicians to ensure a positive team atmosphere. Nepotism from Operations Senior Leadership has invoked fear and confusion by bringing in former friends from previous leadership roles within the business located outside of Coatesville. Operations Senior Leadership conducts business by intimidation, screaming and yelling in meetings, and expectations are not at all understood due to lack of knowledge within this position. The senior leadership in Operations has incurred severe ethics violations which have been egregious violations completely ignored by the H.R. group as well as the B.P.O office due to the impending layoffs known by senior management in September of 2015. The H.R. group is not at all engaged with the employees, and their focus is to ensure Senior Management as well as the company are protected, at the cost of the employees. The recent layoff in September of 2015 was carried out in extremely poor fashion, and some of the most experienced managers and technicians were let go without regard to seniority or performance feedback scores. Nepotism was clearly evident with the recent layoff in September of 2015, as several of the "new" managers that were brought in by the Operations Senior leadership, with less than one year of tenure, were kept, and managers as well as employees that were laid off had experience levels that far surpassed any experience by those retained. Communication by Operations Senior Leadership is extremely poor, and the "silo mentality" is clearly evident. The recent layoff in September of 2015 was conducted in poor fashion, and over 200 highly experienced managers and technicians were laid off. Severance packages were given with specific details expressing that re-hire would invoke forfeiture of severance awarded, yet minority employees were re-hired without re-payment of severance. The S-92 and S-76D production have dwindled to less than 1/4 of the normal production of previous years, and the Light Helicopter Program is an abomination which was completely ignored by Operations Senior Leadership, and the existing manager, an employee with high accolades and experience, was subsequently laid off due to the lack of attention by Operations Senior Leadership. Managers with many years of military and corporate production experience were laid off with no regard to their tenure or performance evaluation scores, and their positions have been filled with the remaining non-experienced employees with no experience in production aircraft builds. The recent layoff was blamed on oil price reduction reported by senior leadership, yet the new S-76D aircraft deliverables were extremely late, with customers backing out of contract due to production dates being pushed out by Operations Senior Leadership's inability to manage the process. The business is a revolving door, and loss of employees by attrition is abundant. Current employees are looking for gainful employment elsewhere since the recent layoff, and communication by senior leadership is non-existent. The recent layoff in September of 2015 has affected some of the most highly experienced employees in a negative way. The families of these employees have been adversely affected, and the careers of some of the most experienced employees in aviation have been ruined due to the lack of leadership and insight by HR and Operations Senior Leadership. Middle Management has had to fend for themselves, and constant criticism by Operations Senior management is the norm. Senior Leadership within the Quality group is atrocious. A once powerful team of some of the best in aviation have been brought to their knees due to the mentality of the current senior leadership. This is not a company that is recommended for a future career in aviation anymore. It has been ruined by those that cannot seem to understand that the customer comes first, and the employees on the floor are the most valuable asset. The HR team is pathetic, and the BPO office is an abomination. Until the senior leadership is purged, this is not an employer of recommendation for anyone looking to enter or further their career in aviation today.

Viewing 19 - 21 of 14,501 Reviews

Glassdoor has 16,634 Lockheed Martin reviews submitted anonymously by Lockheed Martin employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Lockheed Martin is right for you.