Toxic Recruiting Policies - Anonymous employee Randstad Employee Review

1.0
Dec 28, 2022
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Some decent paying work opportunities.

Cons

The cons, basically these people will hire guys to work sites right before layoffs. Then take people who are eligible for unemployment and low-ball them to other employers, with the threat of losing unemployment. This toxic business practice can be used to drive down people's pay opportunities, every subsequent time their 'contract term' expires. You see, this company believes it owns it's employees, even though they are not actively employed, after being laid off, and this slave like relationship negatively impacts ones ability to find a comparable or better paying job after being laid off.

Explore other reviews about Randstad

5.0
May 27, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Loved my team. My Manager was incredibly supportive, understand, and always rooting for myself as well as my teammate's success. Remote work was highly flexible and accommodating.

Cons

Pay was a little low and you don't get paid for holidays in your probationary period but there's growth opportunities after 6 months of employment.

1.0
Apr 27, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Recruiter was responsive at first, and the team I spoke with at the client company seemed professional and genuinely kind.

Cons

Here’s a more detailed “Cons” you can use and tweak: Cons: I went all the way through onboarding for a contract role, spent a full day last week chasing down and uploading sensitive documents (including my passport), and was told I’d be starting this week. Then, at the last minute, I got a single text saying I “didn’t pass” a third‑party ID check — with no explanation of what supposedly failed and no formal notice or report to review. As an American citizen using a valid passport, it’s really disturbing to have a job pulled over an opaque automated screening and to be told “other factors” were flagged without anyone willing or able to say what they were. Even after repeatedly asking, I was given no more than a generic privacy policy and bounced between contacts, which feels extremely careless with my time, my livelihood, and the very private identity data they collected. Best‑practice guidance for background checks says candidates should get clear written notice and a chance to understand or dispute issues before a job is taken away; that absolutely did not happen here.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All