Supervisor don't follow the organization's mission - Health Educator Planned Parenthood Employee Review

3.0
Dec 26, 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Competitive salaries, flexible schedule, nationwide recognition.

Cons

Supervisors shamelessly show favoritism by giving some staff growth opportunities while making other staff stay behind, for example: sending some staff to all training and conferences available even out of state while making some staff stay behind trying to meet all grant requirements. Letting some staff take the lead in making decisions for the team and discouraging others from having a voice. Withholding information from staff, for example, they hid from their employees the fact that the building where they work will be sold and let them find out when they saw the big "for sale" sign posted on the building when they walked to work one morning. Whenever it was mentioned to supervisors about issues and conflicts that could jeopardize grants, supervisors looked the other way and even accused staff bringing the issue to their attention of creating conflict instead of trying to resolve the issues with their team. Each year they send an employee satisfaction survey which means nothing because all these issues are brought up but nothing improves or changes. Letting people stay in leadership positions after showing incompetence by letting grants laps without renewal and not giving the same opportunities to others, or people in leadership positions not being able to understand what was needed to meet grant goals. Pretty much, staff have no leadership or mentorship.

Explore other reviews about Planned Parenthood

5.0
Dec 8, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Awesome work culture, valued employees, great opportunities for growth

Cons

Outside views on work can affect mental load

2.0
May 22, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Not all teams at PPFA are toxic, and you'll meet some of the best, most passionate people here. The time off policy is generous, and the benefits in general are pretty good.

Cons

In recent years, I observed a growing disconnect between the organization’s public messaging around equity and inclusion and the experiences many employees had internally. While PPFA publicly acknowledged the racism tied to its legacy, many staff members felt that meaningful internal progress on equity and antiracism have stalled over time. DEI initiatives were deprioritized, Employee Resource Groups received reduced support, and many employees whose roles focused on equity and inclusion were impacted by layoffs or restructuring. Several employees, particularly BIPOC staff, have expressed frustration with leadership practices that at times felt dismissive of feedback and overly focused on optics. Decision-making often felt disconnected from the day-to-day realities of teams, and many meetings resulted in limited clarity, follow-through, or accountability. Employee feedback mechanisms often did not appear to result in visible organizational change, which contributed to declining trust and morale across the organization. The organization has experienced ongoing restructuring and multiple rounds of layoffs since 2023, creating a persistent sense of instability for many employees. I know of several individuals who were hired and laid off within relatively short periods of time. Career growth and advancement opportunities also felt inconsistent. Some employees perceived that promotions and visibility were influenced more by internal relationships and organizational politics than by measurable performance or impact. Combined with frequent restructuring, this contributed to lower morale and uncertainty about the organization’s long-term direction. Workplace flexibility also appeared unevenly distributed across levels of the organization. While some senior leaders maintained remote flexibility, many employees experienced increasing pressure around in-person expectations. Parents and caregivers, particularly newer parents, often struggled to balance workload demands with limited support from management. Compensation was another common concern among staff. Outside of senior leadership roles, salaries often felt below market compared to similar organizations and responsibilities. Ultimately, it was disappointing to work at an organization whose internal culture did not consistently reflect the progressive values it publicly championed.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All