A good leader trying really hard to bring the company back up. - Biologist Merck Employee Review

4.0
Dec 7, 2008
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good compensation was my primary reason. I received a healthy weekly paycheck. However, my job was salaried and I did a lot of overtime, but there wasn't any compensation for that. One of the other reasons I chose to work at Merck was that their current research areas are in fields that I eventually want to get into, so its helpful to start out in a similar field. Also, because its a huge company, you can move around a lot within the different deparments: antiviral, RNA, drug metabolism, clincial trials etc. This also makes it a good place to work.

Cons

There are very few opportunities to advance within the different departments. You can be a master's degree employee and you might just stay at the same title for 7 to 15 years. They prefer to advance the Ph.D over the employees who've been working there for a long time. Also, people aren't that good at Merck. Some supervisors too ambitious to give credit to those under them. There's hardly and unity or sense of community within Merck. Also, you need to be careful of your money. Merck will really encourage their employees to invest in their stock. Stay away from that, unless you really like Merck.

Explore other reviews about Merck

5.0
Jun 3, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

End of the year shutdown which includes paid time off

Cons

The con for me at the time was that I had to relocate which wasn’t possible

4.0
Jun 2, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Over my tenure, I had the opportunity to work alongside highly talented and mission-driven colleagues dedicated to improving patient outcomes. The organization provided exposure to cross-functional collaboration, leadership development opportunities, and meaningful work supporting healthcare providers, patients, and community stakeholders. I appreciated the company's commitment to innovation, professional growth, and serving patients through scientific advancement.

Cons

Like many large organizations, priorities and organizational structures evolved over time, which occasionally created uncertainty and changes in responsibilities. Decision-making processes could sometimes be complex due to the size of the organization, and navigating multiple layers of stakeholders occasionally impacted speed and execution.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All