Average Technology Company - Anonymous employee Mastercard Employee Review

2.0
Nov 15, 2015
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Flexible timing, work from home, good global brand

Cons

MasterCard is making efforts in portraying itself as aTechnology company. I work for MasterCard Technology india pvt ltd, so this review applies for only MasterCard India. What I have seen in last 1- 1.5 years is middle/top management will get good benefits, promotions but people who actually make things work/ develop products are ignored. Good developers are not appreciated. There are leaders, senior engineers, BL who work for a technology company but have no/very less technical knowledge (There are very few hand full good technical people in this company because of them the company is running ). Salary difference is a huge issue between employees. You can find two employees with same experience with salary difference of about 50-100%. These things have made a very negative impact on current employees. Quality of work depends on the team. Although there many cons these can be addressed by Management, but for that management have to be very aggressive.

Explore other reviews about Mastercard

5.0
Jun 23, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

People are highly intelligent and things seem to operate efficiently

Cons

Large ship so changes are hard to make

4.0
May 27, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Mastercard does a great job fostering an inclusive and supportive environment. There are genuinely good people throughout the organization, and leadership often invests in employee engagement through events, recognition, and culture-building initiatives. I enjoyed many of the relationships I built while working there, and there are teams that truly care about collaboration and supporting one another.

Cons

Compensation at the director level did not feel competitive compared to the level of responsibility expected. Career advancement can also be extremely challenging due to how top-heavy the organization is with senior leadership roles. There are a large number of Senior Vice Presidents, sometimes without clear scope or experience aligned to the title, which creates limited room for high-performing employees to grow. At times, it felt like senior leaders were being hired primarily to manage or communicate with other senior leaders, rather than drive meaningful operational impact. In product and go-to-market roles especially, priorities are often heavily driven by funding decisions. It can be frustrating when projects suddenly shift in importance or remain underfunded for long periods of time while awaiting senior leadership review. This sometimes leaves highly talented employees in limbo, unable to move initiatives forward despite strong momentum or market opportunity. The organization can also be very comfortable with the status quo, which creates a slower pace that many employees seem accustomed to. For people who are highly motivated and eager to drive change, it can feel difficult to navigate the number of roadblocks and layers of approval required to move initiatives forward.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All