“Golden Handcuffs.... Not a Real Technology Company ” It doesn't matter how noble or talented you are.. - Anonymous employee Mastercard Employee Review

1.0
Oct 27, 2015
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Flexible work environments, Brand name, else I do not see any Pros in here.

Cons

As mentioned few other people on Glassdoor, the company is not interested in to their employees, Ajay says if you love to interact with people from different diversity MasterCard is the best place, but I would like to say its opposite. If you a boot polisher and do so for your manager you will be safe else your manager will throw you out of the window. US people see India center as a laborers and expect Indians to work 24 hours. I have not see a single day where you have not worked for more than 13-14 hours. Its a trap. BL's & SBL's enjoy they come late to office and leave early in a span of 4 - 5 hours in office only. But if you will do so you will be scrtunized. MasterCard is a den of fear and retaliation and only a place for people who put up and shut up for the sake of job security. MasterCard in India is backward and cultish and will never excel unless it removes such BL's & SBL's from the organization else MasterCard is gonna spoil its name heavy in nearby future. We have always heard no company is bad or good, its their managers who make it good or bad, and this is what happening in Pune. If you raise your voice you have to face retaliations which MasterCard says retaliations would not be done... MasterCard says internal movement is allowed with in MasterCard but only if you are a boot polisher.

Explore other reviews about Mastercard

5.0
Jun 15, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good people to work with, opportunities for growth

Cons

Tasks may get mundane, otherwise none to speak of

4.0
May 27, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Mastercard does a great job fostering an inclusive and supportive environment. There are genuinely good people throughout the organization, and leadership often invests in employee engagement through events, recognition, and culture-building initiatives. I enjoyed many of the relationships I built while working there, and there are teams that truly care about collaboration and supporting one another.

Cons

Compensation at the director level did not feel competitive compared to the level of responsibility expected. Career advancement can also be extremely challenging due to how top-heavy the organization is with senior leadership roles. There are a large number of Senior Vice Presidents, sometimes without clear scope or experience aligned to the title, which creates limited room for high-performing employees to grow. At times, it felt like senior leaders were being hired primarily to manage or communicate with other senior leaders, rather than drive meaningful operational impact. In product and go-to-market roles especially, priorities are often heavily driven by funding decisions. It can be frustrating when projects suddenly shift in importance or remain underfunded for long periods of time while awaiting senior leadership review. This sometimes leaves highly talented employees in limbo, unable to move initiatives forward despite strong momentum or market opportunity. The organization can also be very comfortable with the status quo, which creates a slower pace that many employees seem accustomed to. For people who are highly motivated and eager to drive change, it can feel difficult to navigate the number of roadblocks and layers of approval required to move initiatives forward.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All