Does HR read these reviews?! Respond to each review on Glassdoor if you actually care about improving MasterCard? - Anonymous employee Mastercard Employee Review

3.0
Mar 29, 2015
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

1) Depending on your group, you can get a global perspective. 2) For married and family people, HQ is in Westchester 3) Good 401K Plan 4) Recognizable Name Brand 5) Starting to build more open space (but bad execution) 6) Meaningful assignments, depending on your group and job

Cons

1) Layoffs. MA likes to fire good people, rather than placing them in a new group. 2) Not in the NYC ; not enough young to mid 20s in the Purchase office (this is a con, depending on your age) 3) Not enough head count; thus we are overworked with the wrong compensation/salary. 4) We act before we think. MA reacts too fast and we have to deal with all the mess and problems due to poor execution. We need more planning. 5) At the executive level, there's isn't enough agreement on the road map. Thus, product executions across regions are inconsistent and disconnected at times. 6) Too much negativity at times. Many people are closed minded and quick to say no to an idea.

Explore other reviews about Mastercard

5.0
Jun 21, 2026
Anonymous intern
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Growth-driven, supportive, mentorship, project opportunities

Cons

Large company, sometimes hard to navigate / large learning curve due to size of company

4.0
May 27, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Mastercard does a great job fostering an inclusive and supportive environment. There are genuinely good people throughout the organization, and leadership often invests in employee engagement through events, recognition, and culture-building initiatives. I enjoyed many of the relationships I built while working there, and there are teams that truly care about collaboration and supporting one another.

Cons

Compensation at the director level did not feel competitive compared to the level of responsibility expected. Career advancement can also be extremely challenging due to how top-heavy the organization is with senior leadership roles. There are a large number of Senior Vice Presidents, sometimes without clear scope or experience aligned to the title, which creates limited room for high-performing employees to grow. At times, it felt like senior leaders were being hired primarily to manage or communicate with other senior leaders, rather than drive meaningful operational impact. In product and go-to-market roles especially, priorities are often heavily driven by funding decisions. It can be frustrating when projects suddenly shift in importance or remain underfunded for long periods of time while awaiting senior leadership review. This sometimes leaves highly talented employees in limbo, unable to move initiatives forward despite strong momentum or market opportunity. The organization can also be very comfortable with the status quo, which creates a slower pace that many employees seem accustomed to. For people who are highly motivated and eager to drive change, it can feel difficult to navigate the number of roadblocks and layers of approval required to move initiatives forward.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All